Re: Stephen Grossman

Article View: sci.philosophy.tech

Article #871

Back to sci.philosophy.tech Previous Next

#871

From: Torkel Franzen
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:53

11 lines
1103 bytes

In article <1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no> solan@smaug.uio.no 
(Svein Olav G. Nyberg) writes:

   >and will like Voltaire defend even his right to be met by proper
   >argument, and not simply abusive language.

  I haven't noticed Voltaire saying anything about Grossman. But you are
a bit hasty, surely, in speaking of his "right to be met by proper
argument". Why do suppose that we have a right to be met by "proper
argument" (whatever this term may mean to you), whatever abusive twaddle
we spout on the net ourselves?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <TORKEL.93Jan21205323@bast.sics.se>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!sics.se!torkel

References:

<spurrett.99.727386124@superbowl.und.ac.za>,<6owNXB1w165w@quake.sylmar.ca.us> <C17rAJ.HFL@umassd.edu> <1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!sics.se!torkel
From: torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen)
Subject: Re: Stephen Grossman
In-Reply-To: solan@smaug.uio.no's message of Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:30:10 GMT
Message-ID: <TORKEL.93Jan21205323@bast.sics.se>
Sender: news@sics.se
Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista
References: <spurrett.99.727386124@superbowl.und.ac.za>,<6owNXB1w165w@quake.sylmar.ca.us>
 <C17rAJ.HFL@umassd.edu> <1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:53:23 GMT
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message