🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <TORKEL.93Jan21223152@bast.sics.se>, torkel@sics.se (Torkel
Franzen) writes:
|> In article <1993Jan21.202625.27001@ulrik.uio.no> solan@smauguio.no 
|> (Svein Olav G. Nyberg) writes:
|> 
|>    >I think it is important first to show that the guy is spreading
|>    >"abusive twaddle" on the net, however obvious it may seem to one-
|>    >self, regardless of person, for two reasons:
|> 
|>   You are of course free to try to correct Grossman. But your comments don't
|> touch on the matter of his having a "right" to this.

My conception of "right" is a much more pragmatic one than you believe,
Torkel. I admit "rights" for another person only so far as I consider
it to be in my own interest, with qualifiers "in the long run" and
"totally". I believe my pragmatic evaluation was well supported by
what I had to say.

|>   As for the pragmatic issue, it has long been clear that there is no point
|> in trying to argue with Grossman.

But then it is even less point in wasting your time just stating
in non-nice words that you don't like him, as that just lowers the
level of the list + consumes everybody's time + give people a lower
opinion of you as a shit-thrower.

At my program, "Author kill" is an option. Very useful.


Solan