Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #884Re: Stephen Grossman
From: Alan Smaill
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 03:51
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1993 03:51
26 lines
1705 bytes
1705 bytes
In article <TORKEL.93Jan21205323@bast.sics.se> torkel@sics.se (Torkel Franzen) writes:
In article <1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no> solan@smaug.uio.no
(Svein Olav G. Nyberg) writes:
>and will like Voltaire defend even his right to be met by proper
>argument, and not simply abusive language.
I haven't noticed Voltaire saying anything about Grossman. But you are
a bit hasty, surely, in speaking of his "right to be met by proper
argument". Why do suppose that we have a right to be met by "proper
argument" (whatever this term may mean to you), whatever abusive twaddle
we spout on the net ourselves?
Hmm, how does this go:
it is right that I am met with abusive twaddle:
therefore I have a right to be met with abusive twaddle.
(Did I get that right?)
--
Alan Smaill, JANET: A.Smaill@uk.ac.ed
Department of Artificial ARPA: A.Smaill%uk.ac.ed@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk
Intelligence, UUCP: ...!uknet!ed.ac.uk!A.Smaill
Edinburgh University.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<SMAILL.93Jan23035151@leven.aisb.ed.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!edcastle!aisb!aisb!smaillReferences:
<spurrett.99.727386124@superbowl.und.ac.za>,<6owNXB1w165w@quake.sylmar.ca.us> <C17rAJ.HFL@umassd.edu> <1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no> <TORKEL.93Jan21205323@bast.sics.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!edcastle!aisb!aisb!smaill From: smaill@aisb.ed.ac.uk (Alan Smaill) Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Subject: Re: Stephen Grossman Message-ID: <SMAILL.93Jan23035151@leven.aisb.ed.ac.uk> Date: 23 Jan 93 03:51:51 GMT References: <spurrett.99.727386124@superbowl.und.ac.za>,<6owNXB1w165w@quake.sylmar.ca.us> <C17rAJ.HFL@umassd.edu> <1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no> <TORKEL.93Jan21205323@bast.sics.se> Sender: news@aisb.ed.ac.uk (Network News Administrator) Organization: DAI, University of Edinburgh Lines: 26 In-Reply-To: torkel@sics.se's message of 21 Jan 93 19:53:23 GMT