Article View: sci.philosophy.tech
Article #887Re: Stephen Grossman
From: Stephen Grossman
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:55
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:55
37 lines
2881 bytes
2881 bytes
In article <1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no>, solan@smaug.uio.no
(Svein Olav G. Nberg) writes:
>
>MY misgivings about Grossman's postings are that he makes grandiose
>claims, or very hard attacks on other philosophies, without being
>able to back them up. It appears that his knowledge is at best
>second-hand, and that he has more copied other people's thinking
>than performed it himself.
>
>This goes in particular for one attack on this person on one list
>dedicated to discussion of Objectivism, where Grossman's "information"
>about the subject at hand (Stirner) was via statements by alleged
>Nietzscheans/Stirnerites as rendered and evaluated by Nathaniel
>Branden. That is: Third hand rumors counted for him as evidense.
SG Instead of claiming THAT I err, you should cite the alleged error and
discuss it. There is a suggestion (tho not an implication) that grandiose
(big?) claims and hard (basic?) attacks are philosophically improper. Assuming
that I have correctly understood your metaphors, I disagree. Philosophy is the
study of basics, and while it involves technicalities, it is valuablr because
it deals w/basics. A debate on basics is the most part of philosaophy. Don't
get so entranced within a specific view that you are unwilling to consider
radical alternatives. That way lies political correctness and the death of
philosophy.
Also, evidence is evidence, whether discovered by me or restated or
quoted by me from someone else. I am not trying to prove how educated i am but,
instead, am offering ideas. Since you oppose the Obj view of Nietzsche and
Stirner, give an alternative instead of focusing on my style of presenting
ideas. Substance si, style no!
________________________________________________________________________________
"In that world, you'll be able to rise in the morning with the spirit
you had known in your childhood: that spirit of eagerness, adventure and cer-
tainty which comes from dealing with a rational universe."
AYN RAND
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen Grossman <PMSC13SG@UMASSD.EDU>
================================================================================
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1F2wx.Aqr@umassd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.gtech.com!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!umassd.edu!SMUCS1.UMASSD.EDU!PMSC13SGReferences:
<spurrett.99.727386124@superbowl.und.ac.za>,<6owNXB1w165w@quake.sylmar.ca.us> <C17rAJ.HFL@umassd.edu>,<1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.gtech.com!noc.near.net!nic.umass.edu!umassd.edu!SMUCS1.UMASSD.EDU!PMSC13SG From: pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU (Stephen Grossman) Subject: Re: Stephen Grossman Message-ID: <C1F2wx.Aqr@umassd.edu> Sender: usenet@umassd.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU Organization: UMASS DARTMOUTH, NO. DARTMOUTH, MA. References: <spurrett.99.727386124@superbowl.und.ac.za>,<6owNXB1w165w@quake.sylmar.ca.us> <C17rAJ.HFL@umassd.edu>,<1993Jan21.183010.22929@ulrik.uio.no> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 15:55:44 GMT Lines: 37