🚀 go-pugleaf

  
> While in general I agree with your response to the simplistic and  
> uncritical view expressed above, the view you express here is also  
> a bit simplistic.  For example, it appears to leave no room for the  
> existence of a phenomenon that is anomalous with respect to the  
  
'existence of a phenomenon' is beyond my sphere of interest at the  
moment. It is in deep oceans or should I say in a drop of grammar :-)  
  
> current theory, thus prohibiting theory change (also, apparently,  
> making it unnecessary!).  
  
In simple words, what you want to say is this; this theory is  
useless to communicate with our colleagues in our activities   
any further...we don't know what to say in accordance with this  
theory...but then What ? What can you say ? According to what ?  
   
> Gary H. Merrill  [Principal Systems Developer, C Compiler Development]