🚀 go-pugleaf

Just thought I'd tell people that a quick look at the file I'm saving
for creating sci.philosophy.language is showing my original assumption
was correct: there isn't enough interest being generated from what I can
tell.  This was the reason I almost didn't put it to a vote.  I could
see from the original discussions that it looked this way.  However, I
had been urged to submit it for a vote anyway by several people, so I
did.

If you are interested in such a group, you should look for the CFV's
which have been posted.  There isn't much voting time left.

This is just a personal reminder from me, and so I am not trying to 
submit an accurate breakdown here of votes or posting anything
"official" (*still* having trouble figuring what that could mean on
a headless unit like this net; and, yes, I've read the stuff I was
supposed to read).

I will say that less than 100 votes have come in and perhaps 1/7th are
'no' votes.  So if you have an interested, get cracking!

For more details, read the "official" postings on this and other groups.

rhorowit@mondrian.csufresno.edu

--
   The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
     North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
        Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
           internet:  laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80