Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1176Re: <None> (reply to Britz)
From: Anthony E. Siegman
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 23:00
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 23:00
14 lines
1113 bytes
1113 bytes
>In ... jonesse@physc1.byu.edu writes: >> >> ... So why throw the BYU work in with P/F claims? >> PLEASE HELP STOP THIS NONSENSE. >>The distinction is clear in Huizenga's book and Frank Close's, but uncritically >>muddled in Mallove's (which I profoundly resent). It seems that believers in >>the unfounded notion that xs heat as claimed by P/F is nuclear USE the >>low-level nuclear findings of the BYU group and others to support their claims. >>To me, this is grossly unfair and fallacious. I will continue to fight such >>nonsense. I'd strongly agree that Jones' genuine science indeed should be (and by knowledgable people is) clearly distinguished from P&F's ??? (whatever it is they do).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan25.230055.12830@EE.Stanford.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!EE.Stanford.EDU!siegmanReferences:
<1993Jan21.153047.359@physc1.byu.edu> <11815@sun13.scri.fsu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!EE.Stanford.EDU!siegman From: siegman@EE.Stanford.EDU (Anthony E. Siegman) Subject: Re: <None> (reply to Britz) Message-ID: <1993Jan25.230055.12830@EE.Stanford.EDU> Organization: Stanford University References: <1993Jan21.153047.359@physc1.byu.edu> <11815@sun13.scri.fsu.edu> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 93 23:00:55 GMT Lines: 17