Article View: sci.physics.fusion
Article #1200Re: Discretionary Spending
From: Jim Carr
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:23
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 14:23
41 lines
2956 bytes
2956 bytes
In article <930126163947_72240.1256_EHL56-1@CompuServe.COM> Jed Rothwell <ub-gate.UB.com!compuserve.com!72240.1256> writes: >To: >INTERNET:fusion@zorch.sf-bay.org > >Rusty Perrin and J. A. Carr have questioned whether the DoE has any legal >authority to conduct CF experiments in the first place, without authorization >from Congress. This is a reasonable question. I have discussed it with I did not say anything of the sort, Jed. I said that DOE *contractors* must be careful to operate within their contracts, which is a bit different from the situation for an NSF grantee. Congress only enters at the appropriation level (and could ban or mandate CF research, but has done neither) and this level is far removed from the level of all but the larger DOE contracts and the largest NSF programs. Congress does micromanage DOE more than NSF, although that changed this past year with the LIGO earmark that has led to large (>10%) cuts in nuclear and materials research (plus others of which I am unaware). All contracts have some discretionary funds, but contractors, especially small ones, must act within the limits of their contract. As Jed notes: >Under normal circumstances, if a scientist at LANL, Fermilab or some other >DoE lab had some level of discretionary spending authority, and he or she >wished to, he could conduct experiments relating to energy. As long as the >experiments stayed within the allowed budget, there would be no problem. Further, with Congressional oversight the way it has been, I believe there has been a general reduction in the discretionary funds available at national labs. Probably goes back to LAMPF, where they managed to excavate the accelerator hall with spare change and the soils testing money during the "pre-design" stage of the project. The situation is different when you are a university researcher with a $60,000 or $100,000 contract to explore some particular project. One needs approval from the contract monitor to shift the entire focus of the contract to some other project. -- J. A. Carr | "The New Frontier of which I jac@gw.scri.fsu.edu | speak is not a set of promises Florida State University B-186 | -- it is a set of challenges." Supercomputer Computations Research Institute | John F. Kennedy (15 July 60)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11843@sun13.scri.fsu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!batcomputer!rpi!gatech!mailer.cc.fsu.edu!sun13!ds8.scri.fsu.edu!jacReferences:
<930126163947_72240.1256_EHL56-1@CompuServe.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!scsing.switch.ch!univ-lyon1.fr!ghost.dsi.unimi.it!batcomputer!rpi!gatech!mailer.cc.fsu.edu!sun13!ds8.scri.fsu.edu!jac From: jac@ds8.scri.fsu.edu (Jim Carr) Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion Subject: Re: Discretionary Spending Message-ID: <11843@sun13.scri.fsu.edu> Date: 27 Jan 93 14:23:49 GMT References: <930126163947_72240.1256_EHL56-1@CompuServe.COM> Sender: news@sun13.scri.fsu.edu Reply-To: jac@ds8.scri.fsu.edu (Jim Carr) Organization: SCRI, Florida State University Lines: 41