🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jul 25, 1:45 am, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 6:12 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
> > Questions:
> > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > electron?
> > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > proton?
>
> > Best regards
> > Louis Nielsen
> > Denmark
>
> What does a shadow weigh?
>
> Your question has no answer because it presumes something that has not
> yet been established - i.e. that an electron has, in some plane, a
> circular cross section that is independent of the means by which it
> may be measured.
>
> The electron is not a geometrical object. It has no geometrical
> properties.
>
> It is a *physical* object.  It has physical properties such as rest
> mass, charge, spin, angular momentum, etc.
>
> "Why is there air?" - Bill Cosby (1965)
>
> Tom Davidson
> Richmond, VA

------------------------
thats more or less the answer!!
ie
there is still no answer for it

one thing is clear at least to me:

the electron is not a 'little tennis ball'
ie
just forget about the solar system and spherical planet
orbiting around!!
according to my understanding  after accumulating some
additional information and   trying to combine it all to gether
so
it has actually  *a few geometrical shapes**
how come ??
if you think about a tennis ball' it is impossible
but if you think about a longish  combination of subparticles
*a chain of sub  particles* it has the basic structure
of a 'string' or a 'rod '
so i suggested the 'eel  'model'
an eel can have many shapes thogh  its basic structure is kept
(length   thickness etc )
but it can be winded or stretched or  twisted
and mostly   vibrating

its difference in energy level is not by rotation
but in its degree of vibration  (as a string)!!

and here comes the innovation:
it is not far away from the proton
and controlled by the proton by sort of **remote control **
**it is attached right to the proton a s  a 'chain of orbitals'
one long cjain of orbitals

now the proton is a s well not a tennis ball '
it has as well  a longish shape (a chain)  of orbitals
NOT ONLY 3 'QUARKS'
BUT MUCH MORE SUB  PARTICLES THAN JUST
3 QUARKS  !!!
 so most 'modern physics as for now
is living in  a paradise of fools
deluding   (and much worse --  cheating !!) themselves and others that
they
'well know'  !!!

(may be the new LHC  has some chnce to make some
better knowledge  provided that those operators of experiments
will have  A MORE** OPEN MIND**
FOR SURPRISES   AND MORE START POINT
OF SKEPTICISM   ABOUT  EXISTING PARADIGMS !)

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------