🚀 go-pugleaf

On 25 Jul., 00:45, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 6:12 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
> > Questions:
> > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > electron?
> > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > proton?
>
> > Best regards
> > Louis Nielsen
> > Denmark
>
> What does a shadow weigh?
>
> Your question has no answer because it presumes something that has not
> yet been established - i.e. that an electron has, in some plane, a
> circular cross section that is independent of the means by which it
> may be measured.
>
> The electron is not a geometrical object. It has no geometrical
> properties.
>
> It is a *physical* object.  It has physical properties such as rest
> mass, charge, spin, angular momentum, etc.
>
> "Why is there air?" - Bill Cosby (1965)
>
> Tom Davidson
> Richmond, VA

ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES?
If an electron is a physical matter-/energy ‘particle’ then it MUST
have a maybe not definite mean geometrical extension.

THE STANDARD-MODEL IS NOT ULTIMATE, MAYBE WRONG?
It is in the not ultimate standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’
that an electron is described without a physical geometrical
extension.
In the standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ the electron is
described as a ‘point-particle’ that have been given AD HOC physical
properties as mass, electric charge, spin, magnetic moment etc.

It must be time experimentally to discover the ‘true’ nature of the
electron!

Best regards
Louis Nielsen
Denmark