Article View: sci.physics.particle
Article #66Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
From: Y.Porat
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:32
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:32
76 lines
3750 bytes
3750 bytes
On Jul 25, 12:13 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote: > On 25 Jul., 00:45, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 24, 6:12 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote: > > > > Questions: > > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the > > > electron? > > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the > > > proton? > > > > Best regards > > > Louis Nielsen > > > Denmark > > > What does a shadow weigh? > > > Your question has no answer because it presumes something that has not > > yet been established - i.e. that an electron has, in some plane, a > > circular cross section that is independent of the means by which it > > may be measured. > > > The electron is not a geometrical object. It has no geometrical > > properties. > > > It is a *physical* object. It has physical properties such as rest > > mass, charge, spin, angular momentum, etc. > > > "Why is there air?" - Bill Cosby (1965) > > > Tom Davidson > > Richmond, VA > > ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES? > If an electron is a physical matter-/energy ‘particle’ then it MUST > have a maybe not definite mean geometrical extension. > > THE STANDARD-MODEL IS NOT ULTIMATE, MAYBE WRONG? > It is in the not ultimate standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ > that an electron is described without a physical geometrical > extension. > In the standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ the electron is > described as a ‘point-particle’ that have been given AD HOC physical > properties as mass, electric charge, spin, magnetic moment etc. > > It must be time experimentally to discover the ‘true’ nature of the > electron! > > Best regards > Louis Nielsen > Denmark -------------- right!! now as is now there is no technical tool to do it so the way to do it as for now is to cpllect all known data and make a good guess so at our situation there is nothing to do but **trial and error* i agree with you that if it is a physical entity the mathematical presentation or model or crippled model IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO MAKE FURTHER REAL ADVANCE IN SCIENCE ATB Y.Porat ----------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2d16c15a-73ee-4344-b369-e1e693b9c0dd@a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <2d6dd978-e3c8-417c-bf6d-ca2b95267253@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <5b2cb379-47e4-4c39-93d0-5b16ef2a0b9d@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f6c41,b2c2349f443d6943 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b2c2349f443d6943 X-Google-Thread: 104f62,b2c2349f443d6943 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c41,gid10b271,gid104f62,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.particle,sci.physics,dk.videnskab Subject: Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON? Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 76 Message-ID: <2d16c15a-73ee-4344-b369-e1e693b9c0dd@a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com> References: <37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <2d6dd978-e3c8-417c-bf6d-ca2b95267253@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <5b2cb379-47e4-4c39-93d0-5b16ef2a0b9d@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.126.23.212 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1216978329 15255 127.0.0.1 (25 Jul 2008 09:32:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.126.23.212; posting-account=5GUrzQkAAADun29oaK3p_W_saUVxxHUF User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)