🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.particle
Article #66

Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?

#66
From: Y.Porat
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:32
76 lines
3750 bytes
On Jul 25, 12:13 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
> On 25 Jul., 00:45, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 24, 6:12 pm, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
> > > Questions:
> > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > > electron?
> > > - What is the value of the experimentally measured ’radius’ of the
> > > proton?
>
> > > Best regards
> > > Louis Nielsen
> > > Denmark
>
> > What does a shadow weigh?
>
> > Your question has no answer because it presumes something that has not
> > yet been established - i.e. that an electron has, in some plane, a
> > circular cross section that is independent of the means by which it
> > may be measured.
>
> > The electron is not a geometrical object. It has no geometrical
> > properties.
>
> > It is a *physical* object.  It has physical properties such as rest
> > mass, charge, spin, angular momentum, etc.
>
> > "Why is there air?" - Bill Cosby (1965)
>
> > Tom Davidson
> > Richmond, VA
>
> ARE ELECTRONS PHYSICAL ENTITIES?
> If an electron is a physical matter-/energy ‘particle’ then it MUST
> have a maybe not definite mean geometrical extension.
>
> THE STANDARD-MODEL IS NOT ULTIMATE, MAYBE WRONG?
> It is in the not ultimate standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’
> that an electron is described without a physical geometrical
> extension.
> In the standard-model of ‘elementary-particles’ the electron is
> described as a ‘point-particle’ that have been given AD HOC physical
> properties as mass, electric charge, spin, magnetic moment etc.
>
> It must be time experimentally to discover the ‘true’ nature of the
> electron!
>
> Best regards
> Louis Nielsen
> Denmark

--------------
right!!

now as is now there is no technical tool to do it

so the way to do it as for now
is to  cpllect all known data
and make a good   guess
so
at our situation there is nothing to do but
**trial and error*
i agree with you that if it is a physical entity
the mathematical presentation or model or crippled model

IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO MAKE FURTHER  REAL ADVANCE
IN SCIENCE

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2d16c15a-73ee-4344-b369-e1e693b9c0dd@a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <2d6dd978-e3c8-417c-bf6d-ca2b95267253@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <5b2cb379-47e4-4c39-93d0-5b16ef2a0b9d@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f6c41,b2c2349f443d6943
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,b2c2349f443d6943
X-Google-Thread: 104f62,b2c2349f443d6943
X-Google-Attributes: gidf6c41,gid10b271,gid104f62,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.particle,sci.physics,dk.videnskab
Subject: Re: THE 'RADIUS' OF THE ELECTRON?
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <2d16c15a-73ee-4344-b369-e1e693b9c0dd@a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
References: <37bc1407-57d5-4632-abd5-b3fb37082dd2@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com> 
 <2d6dd978-e3c8-417c-bf6d-ca2b95267253@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
 <5b2cb379-47e4-4c39-93d0-5b16ef2a0b9d@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.126.23.212
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1216978329 15255 127.0.0.1 (25 Jul 2008 09:32:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:32:09 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a2g2000prm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.126.23.212; 
 posting-account=5GUrzQkAAADun29oaK3p_W_saUVxxHUF
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) 
 Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)