🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #1117

Re: EXERCISE OF DOUBLETHINK IN EINSTEINIANA

#1117
From: gabydewilde
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:27
74 lines
5241 bytes
On Aug 24, 2:33 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.liferesearchuniversal.com/1984-17.html#seventeen
> George Orwell: "Doublethink means the power of holding two
> contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both
> of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories
> must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with
> reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself
> that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it
> would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to
> be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and
> hence of guilt. Doublethink lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since
> the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while
> retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To
> tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any
> fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary
> again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed,
> to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take
> account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably
> necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to
> exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is
> tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this
> knowledge ; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead
> of the truth."
>
> Initial destruction of students' rationality:
>
> http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=...
> "Student understanding of time in special relativity: Simultaneity and
> reference frames"
> American Journal of Physics -- July 2001 -- Volume 69, Issue S1, pp.
> S24-S35
> "This article reports on an investigation of student understanding of
> the concept of time in special relativity. A series of research tasks
> are discussed that illustrate, step-by-step, how student reasoning of
> fundamental concepts of relativity was probed. The results indicate
> that after standard instruction students at all academic levels have
> serious difficulties with the relativity of simultaneity and with the
> role of observers in inertial reference frames. Evidence is presented
> that suggests many students construct a conceptual framework in which
> the ideas of absolute simultaneity and the relativity of simultaneity
> harmoniously co-exist."
>
> Lifelong exercise of doublethink (obligatory even for Einsteiniana's
> highest priests):
>
> http://www.geekitude.com/gl/public_html/article.php?story=20050422141...
> Brian Greene: "I certainly got very used to the idea of relativity,
> and therefore I can go into that frame of mind without it seeming like
> an effort. But I feel and think about the world as being organized
> into past, present and future. I feel that the only moment in time
> that's really real is this moment right now. And I feel [that what
> happened a few moments ago] is gone, and the future is yet to be. It
> still feels right to me. But I know in my mind intellectually that's
> wrong. Relativity establishes that that picture of the universe is
> wrong, and if I work hard, I can force myself to recognize the fallacy
> in my view or thinking; but intuitively it's still what I feel. So
> it's a daily struggle to keep in mind how the world works, and
> juxtapose that with experience that [I get] a thousand, even million
> times a day from ordinary comings and goings."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

epic lolzz

My favorite double think is:

"We ignored all perpetual motion devices because non of them worked."

Second:

"We don't use hemp ethanol for fuel because you must be stoned."
Technical Details
Message-ID: <87a4e1aa-2d3d-477d-8045-3e5dc68ad4ad@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <a60770f8-02d0-4e93-9371-766c404104ea@a26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,63d50491b31f39df
X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: gabydewilde <gdewilde@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Subject: Re: EXERCISE OF DOUBLETHINK IN EINSTEINIANA
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <87a4e1aa-2d3d-477d-8045-3e5dc68ad4ad@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
References: <a60770f8-02d0-4e93-9371-766c404104ea@a26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.104.135.141
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1252909663 2200 127.0.0.1 (14 Sep 2009 06:27:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:27:43 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.104.135.141; 
 posting-account=qHNgPQoAAAA40SLlrmjQxSJhnyKS76HY
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) 
 Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3 GTB5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)