Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #1117Re: EXERCISE OF DOUBLETHINK IN EINSTEINIANA
From: gabydewilde
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:27
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:27
74 lines
5241 bytes
5241 bytes
On Aug 24, 2:33 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > http://www.liferesearchuniversal.com/1984-17.html#seventeen > George Orwell: "Doublethink means the power of holding two > contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both > of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories > must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with > reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself > that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it > would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to > be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and > hence of guilt. Doublethink lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since > the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while > retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To > tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any > fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary > again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, > to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take > account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably > necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to > exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is > tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this > knowledge ; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead > of the truth." > > Initial destruction of students' rationality: > > http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=... > "Student understanding of time in special relativity: Simultaneity and > reference frames" > American Journal of Physics -- July 2001 -- Volume 69, Issue S1, pp. > S24-S35 > "This article reports on an investigation of student understanding of > the concept of time in special relativity. A series of research tasks > are discussed that illustrate, step-by-step, how student reasoning of > fundamental concepts of relativity was probed. The results indicate > that after standard instruction students at all academic levels have > serious difficulties with the relativity of simultaneity and with the > role of observers in inertial reference frames. Evidence is presented > that suggests many students construct a conceptual framework in which > the ideas of absolute simultaneity and the relativity of simultaneity > harmoniously co-exist." > > Lifelong exercise of doublethink (obligatory even for Einsteiniana's > highest priests): > > http://www.geekitude.com/gl/public_html/article.php?story=20050422141... > Brian Greene: "I certainly got very used to the idea of relativity, > and therefore I can go into that frame of mind without it seeming like > an effort. But I feel and think about the world as being organized > into past, present and future. I feel that the only moment in time > that's really real is this moment right now. And I feel [that what > happened a few moments ago] is gone, and the future is yet to be. It > still feels right to me. But I know in my mind intellectually that's > wrong. Relativity establishes that that picture of the universe is > wrong, and if I work hard, I can force myself to recognize the fallacy > in my view or thinking; but intuitively it's still what I feel. So > it's a daily struggle to keep in mind how the world works, and > juxtapose that with experience that [I get] a thousand, even million > times a day from ordinary comings and goings." > > Pentcho Valev > pva...@yahoo.com epic lolzz My favorite double think is: "We ignored all perpetual motion devices because non of them worked." Second: "We don't use hemp ethanol for fuel because you must be stoned."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<87a4e1aa-2d3d-477d-8045-3e5dc68ad4ad@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<a60770f8-02d0-4e93-9371-766c404104ea@a26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,63d50491b31f39df X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: gabydewilde <gdewilde@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique Subject: Re: EXERCISE OF DOUBLETHINK IN EINSTEINIANA Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 75 Message-ID: <87a4e1aa-2d3d-477d-8045-3e5dc68ad4ad@a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> References: <a60770f8-02d0-4e93-9371-766c404104ea@a26g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.104.135.141 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1252909663 2200 127.0.0.1 (14 Sep 2009 06:27:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a7g2000yqo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.104.135.141; posting-account=qHNgPQoAAAA40SLlrmjQxSJhnyKS76HY User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3 GTB5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)