Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #1118Re: DARK ENERGY OR TIRED LIGHT (DECREASED SPEED OF PHOTONS)?
From: Juan R. González-Álvarez
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:22
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:22
45 lines
3030 bytes
3030 bytes
Sam Wormley wrote on Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:47:50 +0000: > john wrote: > > >> Also, tired light explains how every point can be the center for the >> expansion mirage. john > > Tired Light is Still Dead > http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm#News > > 24 Apr 2008 - Blondin et al. (2008) studied distant supernovae using > spectra to judge the age of the object during each observation. They > found an aging rate that varied with redshift z like > > 1/(1+z)(0.97 +/- 0.10), > > compatible with the expected 1/(1+z) for expanding Universes, but 9.7 > standard deviations away from the constant aging rate expected in the > tired light model. It would be a good thing if Wright just cited the abstract of the same reference Blondin et al. that he uses to attack the tired light model. Blondin et al. write about their work: "excluding models that predict no time dilation, such as Zwicky's 'tired light' hypothesis." It seems that Wright mises that if one introduces an evolution of the SB within the scope of Tired Light cosmology it is possible to incorporate the result in the scheme. As said in a previous message none of the three fundamental mechanism for Hubble has been verified. -- http://www.canonicalscience.org/ BLOG: http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/canonicalsciencetoday/canonicalsciencetoday.html
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<pan.2009.09.14.09.25.16@canonicalscience.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!not-for-mailReferences:
<60b568fb-df8c-43d5-9694-2f416d3a4c4d@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4AABCF2E.C51408D3@hate.spam.net> <c4cea810-019f-4ea8-bc99-d785a824dd6d@e12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <23b14328-82ec-404c-b5eb-8517f2cb810a@c37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <742f4847-16b1-4f80-81e8-553d6365dd44@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <WTcrm.41996$5n1.3449@attbi_s21>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 237b8ad48,99f898ba51f96898 X-Google-Attributes: gid237b8ad48,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!feeder.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!not-for-mail From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez <juanREMOVE@canonicalscience.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique Subject: Re: DARK ENERGY OR TIRED LIGHT (DECREASED SPEED OF PHOTONS)? Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:22:53 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 45 Message-ID: <pan.2009.09.14.09.25.16@canonicalscience.com> References: <60b568fb-df8c-43d5-9694-2f416d3a4c4d@m38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4AABCF2E.C51408D3@hate.spam.net> <c4cea810-019f-4ea8-bc99-d785a824dd6d@e12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <23b14328-82ec-404c-b5eb-8517f2cb810a@c37g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <742f4847-16b1-4f80-81e8-553d6365dd44@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> <WTcrm.41996$5n1.3449@attbi_s21> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.eternal-september.org U2FsdGVkX1+JtJ4L2KibQ0qHS0izRXuA5Fg02k9fEN2NeVpRba61199D8Ls7Ykq5s6aRbb7ZKQ5cCnKrNpgblbiXdbYrwdtILF6ZDs13wMSVsr6igSPw3nGU3/X0QM3tGXxJ1lm/u08= X-Complaints-To: abuse@eternal-september.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:22:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/GNR2uHJd7WzLtLfNCZ3AF Cancel-Lock: sha1:nA0vf/c5CP3YZGXvu7wPqXdHZI4=