🚀 go-pugleaf

On Feb 8, 5:36 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> NoEinstein wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 8:42 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
>
> > Folks:  Doug has never made a "+ New Post" on these groups.  But he
> > insists on presuming to be qualified to evaluate the work of others of
> > whom he is jealous.  People should be judged by their body of work.
> > Poor Doug has ZERO of the latter to show in his behalf.  —— NoEinstein
>
> You do not want  to be judged on the body of your work since it is
> all nonsense.  Some of us are here to help ignorant people like
> you learn physics.  After a while, we find out which are ignorant
> and which are stupid.  You are the poster child for stupidity at
> this point, running neck and neck with Ralph and his fake degrees.
>
>
>
> > ——
>
> >>NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>>On Feb 3, 6:57 am, SolomonW <Solom...@nospamAustraliaMail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:22:31 -0800 (PST), Pentcho Valev wrote:
>
> >>>>>(2) The negative result of the Michelson-Morley experiment confirms
> >>>>>the hypothesis that the speed of light is independent of the speed of
> >>>>>the light source (the future 1905 light postulate of Einstein)
>
> >>>>Since we are in 1887, there is no hypothesis that the speed of light is
> >>>>independent of the speed of the light source.
>
> >>>>actually Michelson and Morley were quite stunned with their results and
> >>>>could not explain it.
>
> >>>Dear SolomonW:  M-M was a wrongly designed experiment which was
> >>>incapable of measuring the velocity of light or the velocity of
> >>>anything else.
>
> >>Wrong as usual. It works fine. You understanding and prejudices
> >>are wrong.
>
> >>  Pentcho knows that Einstein was wrong.
>
> >>Pentcho knows very little except that he hates relativity.
>
> >>   But he keeps
>
> >>>insisting on making arguments which I have made outmoded.
>
> >>Your silly arguments are as wrong as his.
>
> >>   M-M simply
>
> >>>lacked a CONTROL.
>
> >>You have no idea what this even means.
>
> >>  So, no "rubber rulers" and warped space-time are
>
> >>>needed to explain the nil results.  The following links should edify
> >>>THINKING people who aren’t infected with Einstein's Disease.  —
> >>>NoEinstein —
>
> >>The links below are very frunny reading for anyone needing a laugh.
>
> >>>Where Angels Fear to Fall
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e...
> >>>Last Nails in Einstein's Coffin
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre...
> >>>Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316...
> >>>An Einstein Disproof for Dummies
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63...
> >>>Another look at Einstein
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721...
> >>>Three Problems for Math and Science
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f...
> >>>Matter from Thin Air
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe...
> >>>Curing Einstein’s Disease
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e...
> >>>Replicating NoEinstein’s Invalidation of M-M  (at sci.math)
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f98526...
> >>>Cleaning Away Einstein’s Mishmash
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847...
> >>>Dropping Einstein Like a Stone
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1...
> >>>Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is
> >>>Copyrighted.)
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8...
> >>>Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science?
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe...
> >>>The Gravity of Masses Doesn’t Bend Light.
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99...
> >>>KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test.
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85...
> >>>Light rays don’t travel on ballistic curves.
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/c3d7a...Hide quoted text -
>
> >>- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Folks: Doug is a persona non grata to science, and to me in
particular.  :-}~ - - - !  NE