🚀 go-pugleaf

On Feb 6, 4:49 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:36:04 -0800 (PST), PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 6, 3:19 pm, hw@..(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 05:22:13 -0800 (PST), PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Feb 6, 5:15 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Feb 6, 1:58 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> > > You find nothing fraudulent again?
>
> >> >> > No.
>
> >> >>http://www.time.com/time/time100/poc/magazine/a_brief_history_of_rela...
> >> >> Stephen Hawking: "So if you were traveling in the same direction as
> >> >> the light, you would expect that its speed would appear to be lower,
> >> >> and if you were traveling in the opposite direction to the light, that
> >> >> its speed would appear to be higher. Yet a series of experiments
> >> >> failed to find any evidence for differences in speed due to motion
> >> >> through the ether. The most careful and accurate of these experiments
> >> >> was carried out by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley at the Case
> >> >> Institute in Cleveland, Ohio, in 1887......It was as if light always
> >> >> traveled at the same speed relative to you, no matter how you were
> >> >> moving."
>
> >> >> No fraud again?
>
> >> >No, and for the very same reason I gave before. You seem to have this
> >> >basic problem with what the light speed postulate actually means.
>
> >> You can see P2 in action by running:www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/gr-aether.exe
>
> >Not quite, this is P2 plus an assumption of absolute space, which is
> >your own added  feature. I'm fully unaware (as is everybody else) that
> >you don't have any idea how to simulate P2 otherwise.
>
> It shows P2 in action in any space with no observers.
> I know it must come as a shock to you to see how bloody stupid it is.

Why, Henri, no it doesn't. You've already confessed this.
How's the lying compulsion going these days?