Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #162Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong .......
From: H Wilson
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:16
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:16
75 lines
4559 bytes
4559 bytes
On 31 Oct 2004 21:49:00 -0800, fsegg@uaf.edu (Eric Gisse) wrote: >H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<crnao0ti5mlnj2e75185h1k3pr4mkqns2m@4ax.com>... >> On 29 Oct 2004 09:37:50 -0700, titanpoint@yahoo.com (Titan Point) wrote: >> >> >H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<6ne1o05f4ml8vs8fffqmqd6k09bh6b3ogt@4ax.com>... >> >> On 28 Oct 2004 01:39:31 -0700, titanpoint@yahoo.com (Titan Point) wrote: >> >> >> >> >H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<m780o01r64c36f6rc53ljm80tcvgtqvncp@4ax.com>... >> >> >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:08:43 GMT, Bill Rowe <readnewscix@earthlink.net.invalid> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >In article <mp0rn0luu869k5au65n99n1aua44vd4pe6@4ax.com>, >> >> >> > H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> As far as I can see, Einstein's version of relativity was never taken >> >> >> >> seriously outside of the USA and GB. It is a western hoax, >> >> >> >> perpetuated by generations of academic inbreeding. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >This merely demonstrates your myopic view. I am certain the Galileo >> >> >> >system planned by ESA will definitely make use of relativity just as the >> >> >> >US GPS system. Additionally, I believe the Russians also built a system >> >> >> >similar to GPS which also must have considered relativity. So, your idea >> >> >> >relativity is taken seriously by just the US and GB is simply fantasy. >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm sure the orbiting clocks will be software adjusted so that they will be in >> >> >> synch with the ground clocks. >> >> >> >> >> >> HW. >> >> > >> >> >Why should that happen, unless they were going out of synchronization >> >> >due to motion and position in the Earth's gravitational field? >> >> >> >> Clocks change rates slightly when relieved of gravitational self compresion >> >> They are also affected by cutting the Earths fields. >> > >> >Is this the best you can come up with? >> > >> >How does "graviational self-compression" affect the transition between >> >energy levels of an electron in a caesium atom? Please quantify with >> >actual mathematics and data of this so-called effect. >> > >> >Otherwise people might think you were just making this up. >> >> >> GPS clocks are observed to change rates when placed into orbit, AS MEASURED BY >> THE ORIGINAL OBSERVER IN THE ORIGINAL FRAME. This is obviously a REAL >> physical/mechanical change. > >Looks like Myxo forced some information into you. This does not bode >well for the theory of compactified dementia... > >> >> PLease explain why you think a mathematical equation can alter the rate of a >> clock? > >Please explain why you think a computer program can alter the action >of a binary star. Geese, one thing you must learn. Computer simulations are used very widely in industrial and scientific research. I will be very surprised if you pass any more exams. > >> >> >> HW. >> >> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<naddo0dr3m3jc7945c3csokfqjc3t9b13b@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!freenix!oleane.net!oleane!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-spool.news.telstra.net!ken-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<7666ed5f.0410222009.6ba27476@posting.google.com> <mp0rn0luu869k5au65n99n1aua44vd4pe6@4ax.com> <readnewscix-17C162.22075126102004@news.west.earthlink.net> <m780o01r64c36f6rc53ljm80tcvgtqvncp@4ax.com> <7c642197.0410280039.332d370e@posting.google.com> <6ne1o05f4ml8vs8fffqmqd6k09bh6b3ogt@4ax.com> <7c642197.0410290837.45f715a6@posting.google.com> <crnao0ti5mlnj2e75185h1k3pr4mkqns2m@4ax.com> <fd0fc2fa.0410312149.9426e58@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,c86d32bc6b9a2b8a X-Google-Thread: f4f6f,c86d32bc6b9a2b8a X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gidf4f6f,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!freenix!oleane.net!oleane!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-spool.news.telstra.net!ken-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: H@..(Henri Wilson) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,can.uucp Subject: Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... Reply-To: hw@.. Message-ID: <naddo0dr3m3jc7945c3csokfqjc3t9b13b@4ax.com> References: <7666ed5f.0410222009.6ba27476@posting.google.com> <mp0rn0luu869k5au65n99n1aua44vd4pe6@4ax.com> <readnewscix-17C162.22075126102004@news.west.earthlink.net> <m780o01r64c36f6rc53ljm80tcvgtqvncp@4ax.com> <7c642197.0410280039.332d370e@posting.google.com> <6ne1o05f4ml8vs8fffqmqd6k09bh6b3ogt@4ax.com> <7c642197.0410290837.45f715a6@posting.google.com> <crnao0ti5mlnj2e75185h1k3pr4mkqns2m@4ax.com> <fd0fc2fa.0410312149.9426e58@posting.google.com> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 75 Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:16:33 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.134.117.137 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1099347393 144.134.117.137 (Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:16:33 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:16:33 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services