Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #165Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong .......
From: The Ghost In The Machine
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:01
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:01
61 lines
3942 bytes
3942 bytes
[can.uucp dropped from followups] In sci.physics.relativity, Henri Wilson <H@.> wrote on Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:14:22 GMT <86ddo0pgt7msi4t4hkis6qh8m017uuscjc@4ax.com>: > On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 18:00:20 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine > <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote: > >>In sci.physics.relativity, Henri Wilson >><H@.> >> wrote >>on Mon, 01 Nov 2004 05:19:41 GMT >><tphbo0tqmlbdl8t69q8ufaltuiechkrhcg@4ax.com>: [snip for brevity] >>> Please explain precisely how the equation relates to the physical >>> clock rate change. >> >>I'd have to do some research; the equation in this case relates >>to both SR and GR issues -- SR because the satellite is moving, >>GR because it's in (slightly less) warped space (caused by the >>Earth's mass). >> >>In any event, NTS-2 did show a discrepancy of about 4.46 * 10^-10 parts, >>before the switch was flipped. > > No, Ghost, I mean 'show me the exactly how the equation alters the observed > clock rate'. > > I was under the impression that the GR equation had something to do with TIME > not clocks. The equation alters neither time nor clocks. Clocks are at best mechanical contrivances that attempt to measure time (and that rather poorly in some cases; even Hafele-Keating had some interesting difficulties with quantum irregularities in their cesium-beam ion units). Time is purely a *human* construct; one can go with a Shubertian Clock Concept if one really wishes, inconvenient as that will make most physics equations (as they would have to be retrofitted to take into account their velocity relative to the absolute time source). We are, actually, fairly close to a Shubertian Clock Concept now; the TAI in particular synchronizes time worldwide -- or tries to. Apparently the clock in Boulder runs a bit fast. In short, the universe is, and we try to measure it. Sometimes we succeed. Regardless of how we pontificate as humans/scientists/goofballs, experiment remains the best confirmation or refutation of a theory, with observation taking second place. (I've yet to work out the exact equation of time slowage, given a certain gravitational acceleration. I've been a bit busy.) [.sigsnip] -- #191, ewill3@earthlink.net It's still legal to go .sigless.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<frlk52-til.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!1f17fd57!not-for-mailReferences:
<mp0rn0luu869k5au65n99n1aua44vd4pe6@4ax.com> <readnewscix-17C162.22075126102004@news.west.earthlink.net> <m780o01r64c36f6rc53ljm80tcvgtqvncp@4ax.com> <7c642197.0410280039.332d370e@posting.google.com> <6ne1o05f4ml8vs8fffqmqd6k09bh6b3ogt@4ax.com> <7c642197.0410290837.45f715a6@posting.google.com> <crnao0ti5mlnj2e75185h1k3pr4mkqns2m@4ax.com> <prcg52-cvv.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> <tphbo0tqmlbdl8t69q8ufaltuiechkrhcg@4ax.com> <678i52-sba.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> <86ddo0pgt7msi4t4hkis6qh8m017uuscjc@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,c86d32bc6b9a2b8a X-Google-Thread: f4f6f,c86d32bc6b9a2b8a X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gidf4f6f,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!1f17fd57!not-for-mail Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,can.uucp From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> Subject: Re: The theory of relativity is 100% wrong ....... References: <mp0rn0luu869k5au65n99n1aua44vd4pe6@4ax.com> <readnewscix-17C162.22075126102004@news.west.earthlink.net> <m780o01r64c36f6rc53ljm80tcvgtqvncp@4ax.com> <7c642197.0410280039.332d370e@posting.google.com> <6ne1o05f4ml8vs8fffqmqd6k09bh6b3ogt@4ax.com> <7c642197.0410290837.45f715a6@posting.google.com> <crnao0ti5mlnj2e75185h1k3pr4mkqns2m@4ax.com> <prcg52-cvv.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> <tphbo0tqmlbdl8t69q8ufaltuiechkrhcg@4ax.com> <678i52-sba.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> <86ddo0pgt7msi4t4hkis6qh8m017uuscjc@4ax.com> Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity X-face: "i;@/WO(?;[KC9sW;wG/4@H[_VFFH4?QHJ#O(?m}7fQMrJ,]0THA'\|e-EPG_>56Mi}_RRhBS'a2}u_7jm)0_+'=$V#E2r4#IQE/d)yMv3_4@hl<)mA&*tDN/ User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (Linux) Message-ID: <frlk52-til.ln1@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> Lines: 61 Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:01:06 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.13.224.98 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net 1099411266 63.13.224.98 (Tue, 02 Nov 2004 08:01:06 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 08:01:06 PST Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net