🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 01:00:58 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
<ewill@sirius.athghost7038suus.net> wrote:

>In sci.physics.relativity, Henri Wilson
><H@.>
> wrote
>on Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:59:28 GMT
><crnao0ti5mlnj2e75185h1k3pr4mkqns2m@4ax.com>:
>> On 29 Oct 2004 09:37:50 -0700, titanpoint@yahoo.com (Titan Point) wrote:
>>
>>>H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<6ne1o05f4ml8vs8fffqmqd6k09bh6b3ogt@4ax.com>...
>>>> On 28 Oct 2004 01:39:31 -0700, titanpoint@yahoo.com (Titan Point) wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> >H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote in message news:<m780o01r64c36f6rc53ljm80tcvgtqvncp@4ax.com>...
>>>> >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:08:43 GMT, Bill Rowe <readnewscix@earthlink.net.invalid>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> >In article <mp0rn0luu869k5au65n99n1aua44vd4pe6@4ax.com>,
>>>> >> > H@..(Henri Wilson) wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> As far as I can see, Einstein's version of relativity was never taken 
>>>> >> >> seriously outside of the USA and GB. It is a western hoax, 
>>>> >> >> perpetuated by generations of academic inbreeding.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >This merely demonstrates your myopic view. I am certain the Galileo 
>>>> >> >system planned by ESA will definitely make use of relativity just as the 
>>>> >> >US GPS system. Additionally, I believe the Russians also built a system 
>>>> >> >similar to GPS which also must have considered relativity. So, your idea 
>>>> >> >relativity is taken seriously by just the US and GB is simply fantasy.
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> I'm sure the orbiting clocks will be software adjusted so that they will be in
>>>> >> synch with the ground clocks.
>>>> >> 
>>>> >> HW.
>>>> >
>>>> >Why should that happen, unless they were going out of synchronization
>>>> >due to motion and position in the Earth's gravitational field?
>>>> 
>>>> Clocks change rates slightly when relieved of gravitational self compresion
>>>> They are also affected by cutting the Earths fields. 
>>>
>>>Is this the best you can come up with?
>>>
>>>How does "graviational self-compression" affect the transition between
>>>energy levels of an electron in a caesium atom? Please quantify with
>>>actual mathematics and data of this so-called effect.
>>>
>>>Otherwise people might think you were just making this up.
>>
>>
>> GPS clocks are observed to change rates when placed into orbit, AS MEASURED BY
>> THE ORIGINAL OBSERVER IN THE ORIGINAL FRAME. This is obviously a REAL
>> physical/mechanical change.
>>
>> PLease explain why you think a mathematical equation can alter the rate of a
>> clock?
>
>It cannot.  However, the clock's rate is altered.  NTS-2 showed
>this long ago (the modern crop don't bother with a flippable
>adjustment switch; the builders just build in the frequency
>shift).
>
>All the equation does is estimate it -- rather accurately, AIUI.

Please explain precisely how the equation relates to the physical clock rate
change.

>
>[.sigsnip]


HW.

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm