Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #267Re: How would we know Herbert Dingle was right or wrong?
From: Androcles
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:53
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:53
36 lines
3270 bytes
3270 bytes
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:0qSdnQtdA_wFgL3S4p2dnAA@giganews.com... | On 1/25/12 1/25/12 1:10 AM, Pentcho Valev wrote: | > On Jan 25, 6:31 am, Tom Roberts<tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in | > sci.physics.relativity: | >> The question is not whether Dingle was wrong, but rather, whether SR is valid. | >> For an incredibly wide domain we know that SR is indeed valid, because of the | >> literally hundreds of experimental tests it has passed: | >> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html | >> Of course knowing that SR is valid implies that Dingle was wrong. | > | > "Hundreds of experimental tests" are impossible to deal with in a | > debate, | | Your problem, not mine. And this is not really a debate. | | | > Let us concentrate on the crucial one: | > The Michelson-Morley experiment (MMX) [...] | > | > Now the truth: In 1887 the Michelson-Morley experiment UNEQUIVOCALLY | > confirmed the assumption that the speed of light of light does vary | > with the speed of the light source, [...] | | This is NOT any sort of "truth". The MMX did no such thing. | | The MMX showed that for their interferometer, no significant fringe shift is | seen. That is ALL THAT IT DID, Lying bastard, it showed that no significant fringe shift is seen while hurtling through the supposed aether at 18.5 miles/second.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<RzVTq.4450$CG.4205@newsfe06.ams2>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh20ni222835pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe06.ams2.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mailReferences:
<174b7b37-92fe-46f5-adb2-9d6341d03f6e@x6g2000pbk.googlegroups.com> <3b-dnZyvTswyDoLSRVn_vwA@giganews.com> <a617ca84-07ff-4d76-86b5-203444ac0b7e@k6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <0qSdnQtdA_wFgL3S4p2dnAA@giganews.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,ad2871e1e5e611ea
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8798ea3ebe371aee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,8798ea3ebe371aee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,8798ea3ebe371aee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 111645,8798ea3ebe371aee
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid41be78289e,gid54ac8f410d,gida846ae8c3c,gid2479375fed,gid237b8ad48,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.238.198 with SMTP id vm6mr49142pbc.3.1327506802407;
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:53:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh20ni222835pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe06.ams2.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail
From: "Androcles" <HM@Hgwrts.phscs.Jan.2012>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
References: <174b7b37-92fe-46f5-adb2-9d6341d03f6e@x6g2000pbk.googlegroups.com> <3b-dnZyvTswyDoLSRVn_vwA@giganews.com> <a617ca84-07ff-4d76-86b5-203444ac0b7e@k6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <0qSdnQtdA_wFgL3S4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
Subject: Re: How would we know Herbert Dingle was right or wrong?
Lines: 39
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Message-ID: <RzVTq.4450$CG.4205@newsfe06.ams2>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.34.67.115
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: newsfe06.ams2 1327506801 82.34.67.115 (Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:53:21 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:53:21 UTC
Organization: virginmedia.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:53:17 -0000