🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #277

Re: speed of light independent of source speed question

#277
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:09
39 lines
3616 bytes
On Sep 1, 10:57 pm, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
> Note also that theoretical physics is not a mere guessing game in which
> arbitrary notions can be combined. The geometric structure of the universe is
> highly constrained, and SR is the only local structure that is not already
> refuted. This requires that anything moving with speed c relative to one
> inertial frame moves with speed c relative to any other frame. (Here c is the
> invariant speed of the Lorentz transform, but experiments show that to high
> accuracy light travels in vacuum with that speed.)
>
> Tom Roberts

You forget to add something extremely important, Honest Roberts: Even
if "light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the
Lorentz transform", Divine Albert's Divine Special Relativity "would
be unaffected" and "today's foundations of modern physics would not be
threatened":

http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/dc1ebdf49c012de2
Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a
nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant
speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both
Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains
of applicability would be reduced)."

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.research/msg/44d3ebf3b94d89ad
Tom Roberts: "As I said before, Special Relativity would not be
affected by a non-zero photon mass, as Einstein's second postulate is
not required in a modern derivation (using group theory one obtains
three related theories, two of which are solidly refuted
experimentally and the third is SR). So today's foundations of modern
physics would not be threatened."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <659e91ab-7907-438d-9048-f58f366bcc89@h17g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!h17g2000vbz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <08513950-fee4-415f-bf3d-3cc7636b6656@s12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <h-adnf0ToNMnbMLT4p2dnAA@giganews.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,254c9749875de629,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,254c9749875de629,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,254c9749875de629,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 111645,254c9749875de629,start
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid54ac8f410d,gida846ae8c3c,gid2479375fed,gid237b8ad48,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!h17g2000vbz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Subject: Re: speed of light independent of source speed question
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 23:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <659e91ab-7907-438d-9048-f58f366bcc89@h17g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
References: <08513950-fee4-415f-bf3d-3cc7636b6656@s12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <h-adnf0ToNMnbMLT4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 79.100.20.121
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1314943777 22322 127.0.0.1 (2 Sep 2011 06:09:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 06:09:37 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: h17g2000vbz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=79.100.20.121; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: ARLUEHNKC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; CPNTDF; .NET4.0C),gzip(gfe)