🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:59:04 -0500, Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 5/10/10 6:59 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 May 2010 07:31:00 -0700 (PDT), PD<thedraperfamily@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On May 9, 4:57 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 08 May 2010 20:28:32 -0500, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>> On 5/8/10 4:58 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
>>>>>> You woulodn't know what div and curl are so I wont bother to explain...
>>>>
>>>>>    Try this one Ralph... you might learn something.
>>>>>     http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393969975/
>>>>
>>>> Physics doesn't need complicated maths any more
>>>> Computer simulations are much easier to construct and are far more informative.
>>>
>>> Two comments:
>>> 1. The math in physics is not complicated.
>>> 2. Simulations are not representative of reality without a *wide*
>>> range of comparison with measurement.
>>
>> Obviously, neither you nor wormey know how to create simulations on a computer
>> .
>>
>>
>> Henry Wilson...
>>
>> .......A relativist's IQ = his snipping ability.
>
>
>   Computer simulation was an essential component of my work
>   in ultrasonics for the better part of at least two decades
>   Henry. 

So you have proved my point then.

>   The simulation isn't worth anything if one doesn't
>   mathematically model the physical phenomena correctly. One
>   need to know the mathematics as it relates to physical
>   properties, in my case, diffraction, refraction, attenuation,
>   wave modes, geometry, boundaries, stresses, scattering,
>   crystallite structure, etc.
>
>   I doubt that you know the first thing about modeling physical
>   phenomena, Henry.

You wouldn't have a ckue, wormey.

Henry Wilson...

.......A relativist's IQ = his snipping ability.