🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 11, 1:28 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:59:04 -0500, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 5/10/10 6:59 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 May 2010 07:31:00 -0700 (PDT), PD<thedraperfam...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>> On May 9, 4:57 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 08 May 2010 20:28:32 -0500, Sam Wormley<sworml...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>>>> On 5/8/10 4:58 PM, Henry Wilson DSc wrote:
> >>>>>> You woulodn't know what div and curl are so I wont bother to explain...
>
> >>>>>    Try this one Ralph... you might learn something.
> >>>>>    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0393969975/
>
> >>>> Physics doesn't need complicated maths any more
> >>>> Computer simulations are much easier to construct and are far more informative.
>
> >>> Two comments:
> >>> 1. The math in physics is not complicated.
> >>> 2. Simulations are not representative of reality without a *wide*
> >>> range of comparison with measurement.
>
> >> Obviously, neither you nor wormey know how to create simulations on a computer
> >> .
>
> >> Henry Wilson...
>
> >> .......A relativist's IQ = his snipping ability.
>
> >   Computer simulation was an essential component of my work
> >   in ultrasonics for the better part of at least two decades
> >   Henry.
>
> So you have proved my point then.
>
> >   The simulation isn't worth anything if one doesn't
> >   mathematically model the physical phenomena correctly. One
> >   need to know the mathematics as it relates to physical
> >   properties, in my case, diffraction, refraction, attenuation,
> >   wave modes, geometry, boundaries, stresses, scattering,
> >   crystallite structure, etc.
>
> >   I doubt that you know the first thing about modeling physical
> >   phenomena, Henry.
>
> You wouldn't have a ckue, wormey.
>
> Henry Wilson...
>
> .......A relativist's IQ = his snipping ability.

Don't be such a Jew Henry.
Thanks for the laughs thou.... ahahaha... ahahahanson

ahahaha.... AHAHAHA....