🚀 go-pugleaf

On May 6, 5:13 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2010 14:51:44 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 6, 4:42 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
> >> On Thu, 06 May 2010 10:36:15 -0500, Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>But then, I shouldn't be wasting my time with physics ignoramuses who
> >> >>>don't know lower division undergrad physics. (Okay, with things the way
> >> >>>they are, it may now be UPPER division undergrad physics...)
>
> >> >> There is no aether
>
> >> >1) Lorentz's transformation doesn't require an aether.
> >> >2) From which level of hell did this straw dog come?
>
> >> >> and no Lorentz transforms you dopey bastard.
>
> >> >You are ignorant.
> >> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation
>
> >> >Note that the Lorentz Transformation predates Einstein's paper by about 8
> >> >years.
>
> >> They were necessary to explain the MMX null result during the times when aether
> >> theories reigned.
> >> There is NO evidence of any physical contraction of length or time.
>
> >> >>Light is
> >> >> ballistic. Einstein's theory is crap.
>
> >> >"Einstein's theory" is crap If and Only If electromagnetism is crap,
> >> >because the Lorentz transformation is simply the transform that holds
> >> >Maxwell's equations invariant.
>
> >> Maxwell's equations require an absolute rest frame. There is none.
>
> >Well, among the baldly false statements you make throughout this post,
> >you've just said that Maxwell's equations don't work and therefore do
> >not describe electrodynamics in nature.
>
> Maxwell's equations use the reference frame of the fields in the apparatus
> used.

You mean the equations you said don't work?
Or do you mean that the absolute reference frame is the reference
frame of the fields in the apparatus used?
You're beginning to babble like Mitch.
He eats on the curb and sleeps in a box. You?

>
> >> Maxwell's derivation of the universal constant 'c' is legitimate....and c just
>
> Henry Wilson...
>
> .......A relativist's IQ = his snipping ability.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -