🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5303

Re: VERY DIFFICULT DEDUCTIONS IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD

#5303
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:03
101 lines
7252 bytes
On Mar 30, 7:28 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> A rocket with length h accelerates with acceleration g. A light source
> at the front end emits light with speed c relative to the source. A
> receiver at the back end receives the light and measures its speed c'
> to be:
>
> Premise 1: constant, c'=c.
>
> Premise 2: variable, c'=c+v, where v is the relative speed of the
> light source (at the moment of emission) and the receiver (at the
> moment of reception).
>
> A light source at the top of a tower of height h emits light with
> speed c relative to the source. A receiver on the ground receives the
> light.
>
> Prediction 1 deduced from Premise 1: The receiver on the ground will
> measure the speed of light to be constant, c'=c.
>
> Prediction 2 deduced from Premise 2: The receiver on the ground will
> measure the speed of light to be variable, c'=c(1+gh/c^2), an equation
> Einstein deduced in 1911. The receiver will also measure the
> gravitational redshift factor to be 1+gh/c^2, a value predicted by
> Einstein and confirmed experimentally by Pound and Rebka in 1960.

There are Einsteinians who make confessions consistent with Premise 2
and Prediction 2:

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/OntologyOUP_TimesNR.pdf "What Can
We Learn about the Ontology of Space and Time from the Theory of
Relativity?", John D. Norton: "In general relativity there is no
comparable sense of the constancy of the speed of light. The constancy
of the speed of light is a consequence of the perfect homogeneity of
spacetime presumed in special relativity. There is a special velocity
at each event; homogeneity forces it to be the same velocity
everywhere. We lose that homogeneity in the transition to general
relativity and with it we lose the constancy of the speed of light.
Such was Einstein's conclusion at the earliest moments of his
preparation for general relativity. ALREADY IN 1907, A MERE TWO YEARS
AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL THEORY, HE HAD CONCLUDED THAT THE
SPEED OF LIGHT IS VARIABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD."

http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.3/smolin.htm Lee Smolin: "Quantum
theory was not the only theory that bothered Einstein. Few people have
appreciated how dissatisfied he was with his own theories of
relativity. Special relativity grew out of Einstein's insight that the
laws of electromagnetism cannot depend on relative motion and that the
speed of light therefore must be always the same, no matter how the
source or the observer moves. Among the consequences of that theory
are that energy and mass are equivalent (the now-legendary
relationship E = mc2) and that time and distance are relative, not
absolute. SPECIAL RELATIVITY WAS THE RESULT OF 10 YEARS OF
INTELLECTUAL STRUGGLE, YET EINSTEIN HAD CONVINCED HIMSELF IT WAS WRONG
WITHIN TWO YEARS OF PUBLISHING IT."

http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae13.cfm
"So, it is absolutely true that the speed of light is _not_ constant
in a gravitational field [which, by the equivalence principle, applies
as well to accelerating (non-inertial) frames of reference]. If this
were not so, there would be no bending of light by the gravitational
field of stars....Indeed, this is exactly how Einstein did the
calculation in: 'On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of
Light,' Annalen der Physik, 35, 1911. which predated the full formal
development of general relativity by about four years. This paper is
widely available in English. You can find a copy beginning on page 99
of the Dover book 'The Principle of Relativity.' You will find in
section 3 of that paper, Einstein's derivation of the (variable) speed
of light in a gravitational potential, eqn (3). The result is,
c' = c0 ( 1 + V / c^2 )
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
speed of light c0 is measured."

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp "The first confirmation of a
long range variation in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964. Irwin Shapiro, it seems, was the first to make use of a
previously forgotten facet of general relativity theory -- that the
speed of light is reduced when it passes through a gravitational
field....Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated:"In the second
place our result shows that, according to the general theory of
relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in
vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the
special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently
referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
varies with position."......Today we find that since the Special
Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called
mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that
the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat
surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the
Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der
Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the
gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light
in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for
the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity.
One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2)
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL
REDSHIFT FACTOR."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <73c10711-f099-460f-ae14-24c4cc5d13d2@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <f14c168c-9a5d-4508-a780-811ac729f293@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,ea3670cd4be31593
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,ea3670cd4be31593
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,ea3670cd4be31593
X-Google-Thread: f55d3,ea3670cd4be31593
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,ea3670cd4be31593
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gidf55d3,gid1139f8,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths
Subject: Re: VERY DIFFICULT DEDUCTIONS IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 101
Message-ID: <73c10711-f099-460f-ae14-24c4cc5d13d2@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <f14c168c-9a5d-4508-a780-811ac729f293@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.161
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1206968621 23207 127.0.0.1 (31 Mar 2008 13:03:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:03:41 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.161; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET 
 CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)