🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5315

Re: EINSTEINIANA: THE FUNDAMENTAL CAMOUFLAGE

#5315
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:04
127 lines
8547 bytes
On Mar 24, 8:26 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 24, 3:12 am, xxein <xx...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 23, 10:23 am,PentchoValev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > http://www.bartleby.com/173/22.html
> > > Albert Einstein: "In the second place our result shows that, according
> > > to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the
> > > velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two
> > > fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity and to
> > > which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any unlimited
> > > validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the
> > > velocity of propagation of light varies with position. Now we might
> > > think that as a consequence of this, the special theory of relativity
> > > and with it the whole theory of relativity would be laid in the dust.
> > > But in reality this is not the case. We can only conclude that the
> > > special theory of relativity cannot claim an unlimited domain of
> > > validity; its result hold only so long as we are able to disregard the
> > > influences of gravitational fields on the phenomena (e.g. of light)."
>
> > > There is a trivial truth Einstein uses in this case: the speed of
> > > light "varies with position" in a gravitational field but, in the
> > > absence of a gravitational field or in a free-falling laboratory, it
> > > does not vary with position and IN THIS SENSE is constant. However
> > > Einstein knows that in Einstein zombie world constancy in any sense
> > > could easily become constancy in the sense of Einstein's 1905 false
> > > light postulate:
>
> > > http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
> > > "....light is always propagated in empty space with a definite
> > > velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting
> > > body."
>
> > > So Einstein zombie world will never realize that the fact that the
> > > speed of light "varies with position" in a gravitational field implies
> > > that, in the absence of a gravitational field, it does depend on "the
> > > state of motion of the emitting body" and so the 1905 light postulate
> > > is violated. The intimate relationship between Einstein and Einstein
> > > zombie world is nicely expressed by the Cambridge Professor John
> > > Barrow:
>
> > > http://www.aapps.org/archive/bulletin/vol15/15-5/15_5_p2p3%7F.pdf
> > > John Barrow: "Einstein restored faith in the unintelligibility of
> > > science. Everyone knew that Einstein had done something important in
> > > 1905 (and again in 1915) but almost nobody could tell you exactly what
> > > it was. When Einstein was interviewed for a Dutch newspaper in 1921,
> > > he attributed his mass appeal to the mystery of his work for the
> > > ordinary person: "Does it make a silly impression on me, here and
> > > yonder, about my theories of which they cannot understand a word? I
> > > think it is funny and also interesting to observe. I am sure that it
> > > is the mystery of non-understanding that appeals to them...it impresses
> > > them, it has the colour and the appeal of the mysterious."
>
> > >PentchoValev
> > > pva...@yahoo.com
>
> > xxein: "So Einstein zombie world will never realize that the fact that
> > the
> > speed of light "varies with position" in a gravitational field
> > implies
> > that, in the absence of a gravitational field, it does depend on "the
> > state of motion of the emitting body".
>
> > It does not imply that at all.
>
> A light source at the top of a tower of height h emits photons with
> speed c (relative to the source). The photons accelerate so that, when
> they reach a receiver on the ground, their speed (relative to the
> receiver) is
>
> c' = c(1 +gh/c^2)               /1/
>
> which is Einstein's 1911 equation. Now a rocket with length h
> accelerates with acceleration g. A light source at the front end emits
> photons with speed c (relative to the source). When the photons reach
> the receiver at the back end, this receiver has a speed v relative to
> the light source at the moment of emission. What is the speed of the
> photons, c', relative to the receiver, at the moment of reception?
>
> You should only apply Einstein's equivalence principle and see that
>
> gh = cv               /2/
>
> Substitute this into /1/ and you obtain
>
> c' = c + v                     /3/

Some support coming from Einsteinians:

http://admin.wadsworth.com/resource_uploads/static_resources/0534493394/4891/Ch01-Essay.pdf
Clifford Will: "Gravitational Redshift  Another consequence of
Einstein's insight is the gravitational redshift effect, which is a
frequency shift between two identical clocks placed at different
heights in a gravitational field. For small differences in height h
between clocks, the shift in the frequency Df is given by (Df/f=gh/
c^2) where g is the local gravitational acceleration and c is the
speed of light."

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-gcont.asp "The first confirmation of a
long range variation in the speed of light travelling in space came in
1964. Irwin Shapiro, it seems, was the first to make use of a
previously forgotten facet of general relativity theory -- that the
speed of light is reduced when it passes through a gravitational
field....Faced with this evidence, Einstein stated:"In the second
place our result shows that, according to the general theory of
relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in
vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the
special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently
referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of
light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light
varies with position."......Today we find that since the Special
Theory of Relativity unfortunately became part of the so called
mainstream science, it is considered a sacrilege to even suggest that
the speed of light be anything other than a constant. This is somewhat
surprising since even Einstein himself suggested in a paper "On the
Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light," Annalen der
Physik, 35, 1911, that the speed of light might vary with the
gravitational potential. Indeed, the variation of the speed of light
in a vacuum or space is explicitly shown in Einstein's calculation for
the angle at which light should bend upon the influence of gravity.
One can find his calculation in his paper. The result is c'=c(1+V/c^2)
where V is the gravitational potential relative to the point where the
measurement is taken. 1+V/c^2 is also known as the GRAVITATIONAL
REDSHIFT FACTOR."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <02b8bb03-196c-475f-8475-27420e1abbc4@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <c95be7c8-b3bd-4918-aa71-2d13d8833adb@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <61f30f4e-d15c-49c6-8aba-5fe49b6dc751@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <ecee31c3-cbb8-4161-a05e-33d9e3050c43@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <88391800-2eb9-44d8-b1e5-f38867ad1307@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,ad65ba5bedb830a9
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,ad65ba5bedb830a9
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,ad65ba5bedb830a9
X-Google-Thread: f55d3,ad65ba5bedb830a9
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,ad65ba5bedb830a9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gidf55d3,gid1139f8,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths
Subject: Re: EINSTEINIANA: THE FUNDAMENTAL CAMOUFLAGE
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 02:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 127
Message-ID: <02b8bb03-196c-475f-8475-27420e1abbc4@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <c95be7c8-b3bd-4918-aa71-2d13d8833adb@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> 
 <61f30f4e-d15c-49c6-8aba-5fe49b6dc751@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <ecee31c3-cbb8-4161-a05e-33d9e3050c43@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
 <88391800-2eb9-44d8-b1e5-f38867ad1307@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.91.141.166
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1206608667 28753 127.0.0.1 (27 Mar 2008 09:04:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:04:27 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.91.141.166; 
 posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET 
 CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)