🚀 go-pugleaf

On 23 Feb 2007 08:18:36 -0800, "jesshc"
<jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote:

>
>George Hammond wrote:
>> On 22 Feb 2007 15:16:41 -0800, "JessHC"
>> <jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >George Hammond wrote:
>> >> On 22 Feb 2007 13:23:52 -0800, "JessHC"
>> >> <jesshc@phantomemail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >I like how your paper claims children see the world as "bigger and
>> >> >faster" because their minds are underdeveloped, which therefore proves
>> >> >adults' minds are also underdeveloped.  All this time I thought it was
>> >> >because we start out relatively small compared to the rest of the
>> >> >world, and then grow bigger.
>> >>
>> >> [Hammond]
>> >> IT IS;
>> >
>> >Nope.  You're wrong.
>> >
>> >> because:
>> >>
>> >>               "...we start out relatively small
>> >>                 compared to the rest of the
>> >>                 world, and then grow bigger"
>> >
>> >Unfortunately, the actual size of things don't change.
>>
>> Depends on how you define the size of things doesn't it stupid.
>

>[JessHC]
>Grow up.  Defining the size of something doesn't affect the size of
>that thing.
>

[Hammond]
  That is where you are sadly mistaken.... and THAT is why
you can't understand what God is!
  PHYSICS measures the size and speed of something relative
to "the clock on the wall" and "the ruler on the desk".
  HOWEVER,  a physics measurement is not what people
ACTUALLY SEE.
   Example:  If we are in a car and the speedometer says 55
then everyone AGREES that the "physics measurement" (also
called the "objective" measurement) of our speed is 55 mph.
However, the 5 year old kid in the back seat looks out the
windowm and says "boy, we're really going fast as blazes"
while the old man drivng the car says "sheeeet kind, we're
barely crawling... cars are passing me like crazy".  OK...
these are "subjective" measurements of spacetime.
And that's the whole point..... a Physics book is all about
what a "standard clock" and a "standard ruler" (or a
"standard person" would see, while the Bible is all about
what "real people" actually see... and as we just
demonstrated.... all people agree on "objective
spacetime".... but NOBODY agrees with anyone else about the
size and speed of "subjective spacetime".  And so
finally.... it is this DIFFERENCE in "subjective spacetime"
between people that causes the phenomena known as "GOD".
  Finally, the AMAZING DISCOVERY that Hammond has made, is
that the difference in "subjective spacetime" between people
is described as a "curvature" of subjective spacetime where
the amount of curvature is proportional to the individual
person's brain growth.  We note that a 9 year old has a 50%
brain growth, because people stop growing at age 18.
  Yawn... talking to amateurs certainly is time consuming...
wherer are all the fuckin geniuses?

========================================
     SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
 http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
   mirror site:
 http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
      GOD=G_uv   (a folk song on mp3)
 http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
========================================












>> >> and SO DOES THE BRAIN,
>> >
>> >Which has nothing whatsoever to do with the perceived relative size or
>> >speed of anything.
>>
>> Wrong stupid.... if the brain is slow, the world seems fast and vice versa.
>
>Try actually addressing the point, rather than dodging and running;
>please provide legitimate objective verifiable evidence for your
>assertion.  If the procession of events exceeds the ability of the
>brain to process those events, it does not follow that the brain
>perceives those events to be occurring at a different rate; it merely
>means the processing ability of the brain has been exceeded.
>
>>If a person is small his brain tells him the world is big. Stupid.
>
>Grow up.  Join reality.  Please provide legitimate objective
>verifiable evidence for this assertion.  Then provide legitimate
>objective verifiable evidence that this has anything to do with the
>existence of any deities.  Bear in mind, your merely repeating your
>assertion doesn't prove anything, no matter how much pseudo-scientific
>jargon you throw in.
>
>> >> which is why the world looks "bigger and faster" when you are small......
>> >
>> >Non sequitur.
>>
>> na... relevant fact
>
>Nope.  It does not follow that the size of the brain has anything to
>do with the perceived size of any part of reality.  If you were what
>you claim to be, you'd know that.  Therefore, you aren't what you
>claim to be.  There's a surprise; someobody on usenet pretending to be
>something they're not.
>
>> >  The world looks "'bigger and faster' when you are
>> >small" because of the physical size of the child; it has nothing to do
>> >with the level of the development of the brain,
>>
>> don't be a half witted schmuck.....
>
>Argumentum ad hominem.  You lose.
>
>> a younger, smaller brain
>> has SLOWER MENTAL SPEED and therefore the wrold looks
>> FASTER...
>
>You have yet to support this assertion with any objective, verifiable
>evidence; ain't that just too fucking bad.  Additionally, your asinine
>assertion has been refuted.  Repeating the assertion doesn't magically
>make it true.  Argumentum ad nauseam.  You lose.
>
>> you don't know what the fuck you're talking about atheist dipshit.
>
>That's funny, in that I'm not the one making references to woo-woo
>unsupported illogical pseudo-scientific nonsense.  Argumentum ad
>nauseam.  Argumentum ad hominem.  You lose.
>
>> snip rest..... come back and talk to me after you get a
>> couple of degrees in physics.... either that or learn some manners dipshit.
>
>Here's a better idea: learn some logic.  Learn that because you
>desperately wish something to be true doesn't actually make it so.
>Now fuck off, you ignorant, ill-mannered, worthless, arrogant,
>pusillanimous insect.  You scabby, bleeding, infected asshole.  You
>vomitous, pus-laced pile of rotted shit.