🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5433

Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION

#5433
From: Androcles
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:28
91 lines
6289 bytes
"xxein" <xxein@comcast.net> wrote in message 
news:3218e20d-8978-4c40-af75-2901fb6d25c4@60g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 1, 10:04 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
> "xxein" <xx...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:6d7970b1-0f23-4c9c-8143-abf625234e89@y77g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 1, 7:49 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "xxein" <xx...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:1584838d-0503-436d-bab2-7cd988511498@c33g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> > On Mar 1, 2:51 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Astronomy/Cosmology/...
> > > The Life of the Cosmos
> > > Lee Smolin
> > > "Lee Smolin offers a new theory of the universe that is at once
> > > elegant, comprehensive, and radically different from anything proposed
> > > before....Natural selection may guide the appearance of the laws of
> > > physics, favoring those universes which best reproduce.....Offers an
> > > intriguing blend of the ideas of Einstein and Darwin. Argues that the
> > > laws of nature may themselves be subject to natural selection."
>
> > > In fact, Lee Smolin has initially discovered that Einstein's idiotic
> > > "law of nature" according to which the speed of light is constant does
> > > not allow Einstein zombie world to reproduce successfully anymore:
>
> > >http://edge.org/3rd_culture/smolin03/smolin03_index.html
> > > Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the
> > > effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of
> > > the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory
> > > that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the
> > > same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the
> > > sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself
> > > based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy
> > > of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized
> > > Einstein's general theory of relativity. Because Einstein's special
> > > theory is only a kind of approximation to his general theory, we can
> > > implement the principles of the latter but find modifications to the
> > > former. And this is what seems to be happening! So Gambini, Pullin,
> > > and others calculated how light travels in a quantum geometry and
> > > found that the theory predicts that the speed of light has a small
> > > dependence on energy. Photons of higher energy travel slightly slower
> > > than low-energy photons....A very exciting question we are now
> > > wrestling with is, How drastically shall we be forced to modify
> > > Einstein's special theory of relativity if the predicted effect is
> > > observed? The most severe possibility is that the principle of
> > > relativity simply fails....But there is another possibility. This is
> > > that the principle of relativity is preserved, but Einstein's special
> > > theory of relativity requires modification so as to allow photons to
> > > have a speed that depends on energy. The most shocking thing I have
> > > learned in the last year is that this is a real possibility. A photon
> > > can have an energy-dependent speed without violating the principle of
> > > relativity!"
>
> > > Fortunately, Smolin has also discovered that Einstein's 1905 false
> > > light postulate, like any other law of nature, is subject to natural
> > > selection. So a new species called "Einstein zombie world with
> > > variable speed of light" will emerge soon and this new species will
> > > reproduce so well that, in the struggle for survival, all other
> > > species will disappear forever.
>
> > > Pentcho Valev
> > > pva...@yahoo.com
>
> > | xxein: Smolin did it wrongly and came to wrong conclusions as a
> > | victim of what he doesn't properly understand of the physic. Anyone
> > | and everyone does this.
>
> > xxein did it wrongly and came to wrong conclusions as a
> > victim of what he doesn't properly understand of mathematics.
> > Geez you stupid shit.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> | xxein: I can twist mathematics to choke you to death,
>
> Not as well as I can, Geez you stupid shit. Have a go, we'll see if
> "Geez, you stupid fart" will succumb to "Geez you stupid shit"
> and say "uncle".- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

xxein:  See?  You admit that you twist math to suit a belief.

I straighten it, Geez you stupid shit. Have a go, fuckhead.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <mytyj.160284$LD6.96650@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!194.117.148.138.MISMATCH!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <9b8653a5-edbb-4b1e-9050-6f284a91aa28@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1584838d-0503-436d-bab2-7cd988511498@c33g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <bQmyj.160169$LD6.122039@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <6d7970b1-0f23-4c9c-8143-abf625234e89@y77g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <GOoyj.68158$jH4.7330@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <3218e20d-8978-4c40-af75-2901fb6d25c4@60g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,a14350f33f45c7c6
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,a14350f33f45c7c6
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,a14350f33f45c7c6
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,a14350f33f45c7c6
X-Google-Thread: f55d3,a14350f33f45c7c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gidf55d3,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!194.117.148.138.MISMATCH!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,fr.sci.philo
References: <9b8653a5-edbb-4b1e-9050-6f284a91aa28@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1584838d-0503-436d-bab2-7cd988511498@c33g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <bQmyj.160169$LD6.122039@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <6d7970b1-0f23-4c9c-8143-abf625234e89@y77g2000hsy.googlegroups.com> <GOoyj.68158$jH4.7330@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <3218e20d-8978-4c40-af75-2901fb6d25c4@60g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: EINSTEIN 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE SUBJECT TO NATURAL SELECTION
Lines: 93
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Message-ID: <mytyj.160284$LD6.96650@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:28:02 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.34.70.125
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk 1204446482 82.34.70.125 (Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:28:02 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:28:02 GMT