🚀 go-pugleaf

Yes Pentcho.

I think it was Einstein himself that said that he got the mercury perihelion
with the wrong sign but approx. the same size. I think it was an Einstein
Publishing at BI Hochschultaschenb�cher.
But i lost this little book where Einstein presented his theories.


Now they have what they demanded for. Photon bending as in GR and mercury
perihelion as in GR
They need just use the velocity dependent masses in classical mechanics but
place them into the gravity force of Newton too. Thats all.

I hope i will get a positive resonance from these Relativists that what i
say is true at least.
Thats why i discuss it here.

Thanks

Josef



"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:54079f1c-d835-463e-b2cc-90ec40325f38@b29g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 20, 1:48 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
> Josef Matz wrote:
> > GR was developed mainly because of light bending effect.
>
> Your knowledge of history is woefully inadequate.
>
> GR was developed because Einstein saw inconsistencies between Newtonian
> gravitation and SR.

Roberts Roberts your criminal (and cleverer) brothers have explained
this in such a nice way:

http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.3/smolin.htm "Einstein's Legacy --
Where are the "Einsteinians?", Lee Smolin: "Quantum theory was not the
only theory that bothered Einstein. Few people have appreciated how
dissatisfied he was with his own theories of relativity. Special
relativity grew out of Einstein's insight that the laws of
electromagnetism cannot depend on relative motion and that the speed
of light therefore must be always the same, no matter how the source
or the observer moves. Among the consequences of that theory are that
energy and mass are equivalent (the now-legendary relationship E =
mc2) and that time and distance are relative, not absolute. SPECIAL
RELATIVITY WAS THE RESULT OF 10 YEARS OF INTELLECTUAL STRUGGLE, YET
EINSTEIN HAD CONVINCED HIMSELF IT WAS WRONG WITHIN TWO YEARS OF
PUBLISHING IT."

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/OntologyOUP_TimesNR.pdf "What Can
We Learn about the Ontology of Space and Time from the Theory of
Relativity?", John D. Norton: "In general relativity there is no
comparable sense of the constancy of the speed of light. The constancy
of the speed of light is a consequence of the perfect homogeneity of
spacetime presumed in special relativity. There is a special velocity
at each event; homogeneity forces it to be the same velocity
everywhere. We lose that homogeneity in the transition to general
relativity and with it we lose the constancy of the speed of light.
Such was Einstein's conclusion at the earliest moments of his
preparation for general relativity. ALREADY IN 1907, A MERE TWO YEARS
AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE SPECIAL THEORY, HE HAD CONCLUDED THAT THE
SPEED OF LIGHT IS VARIABLE IN THE PRESENCE OF A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com