🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 24, 11:34 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/George Orwell "1984":
> "In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and
> you would have to believe it.

hahahaha

How weirdly I got into the topic from the angle of comedy.

As a comedian I had metaphysically deployed the conversation of energy
with the other fruitless thoughts.

The comedy aspect was CLEARLY driven, propelled and propagated by the
dishonesty of it's victims.

I hereby proudly announce how I still don't know the basics of
physics. But the odds are not zero for me to detect dishonesty when it
tries to con me.

It seems to me that even Newton missed the obvious. He had loadstone's
didn't he? Why didn't he build a perpetual motion device? After all
his failure he probably became dishonest about it. It's more like the
rule as the exception.

I wouldn't know where to begin 'n explain even if anyone was
interested.

The order of things is just totally wrong.

Lets try...

One should evolve a theory around an observation in stead of evolving
observations around theories.

Engineering should be the source of unknown effects.

Here it instantaneously it becomes clear how the experiment is
unavailable for pet theory propaganda.

One does not apply an experiment to a theory. Things just don't work
like that. The experiment MAY have real world application. The denial
of real world application is the denial of one's own use.

Like a gigantic team of software developers coding a trillion dollar
pixel accelerator.

jajajajajjaja

If we know how fast the pixel moves across the screen then we can
calculate the speed of dumb.

Which is inverse proportional with the rate of accomplishments.

HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAA

ok ok,

say we have an electric chair on a stage.

At the left of the chair we have a gigantic battery that is fully
charged.

At the right we have an empty battery.

We put the first skeptic on the chair.

We hook the negative terminals of the batteries up to another.

The positive terminals go to the chair.

We pull the lever and the electricity flows from the battery at the
left to the one at the right.

We keep electrocuting skeptics until the difference is gone.

We now add one more empty battery.

Ok we hook up the chair with the half full batteries in series and we
discharge those into the empty one.

More skeptics go up in smoke.

We can now fry 6 times as much brainless morons using the same
gradient.

If we would replace the chair with an electric motor we could charge
additional batteries with the back emf.

If we would use bursts of pulses we would also be able to get some
radiant energy action going on.

The extra battery charges faster as the source can displace it's
potential.

It'zz nut geuing anywhere.

lolzzz

lets spin some electrostatic thingy all'zo lolzzz !!

Then when teh miztifying apparatuzz zpinnzz we may utilize the
gravitational ozialtionzzz all'zo.

Thats how funny physics is.

I can see the headlines already: "Comedian strikes gold."

anyway,

have a nice day.

:-)

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress

http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl

http://fototour.blogspot.com

http://wind-car.go-here.nl