Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5866Re: WHY THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS CONSTANT
From: Androcles
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:24
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:24
123 lines
6991 bytes
6991 bytes
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message news:3aShj.1480$Zo3.830@trnddc02... | Now Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> doctored in message | news:p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com... | http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/53d76c65c83ec84a > | and now in news:crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com... | and again in news:9ggfo35lnptme7jkd4r1uua6ogslpi4bkn@4ax.com... | but still no answer to: | > | [Henry] | [1] 'EMPTY' space has NO dielectric properties. | If one tries to measure same, one merely measures the | properties of one's own apparatus....and probably gets 'c'. | Henri Wilson. ASTC, BSc,DSc(T) | < http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > | >>> | hanson] | [2] ... ahahaha.. What do you mean by "probably"? | Probe ever so kosher Osher Doctorow for a | a numerical probability value of your notion. | >>> | [3] Here we do have a great opportunity to see | what kosher P-value Osher has with his *PI*, | Osher's Precious Intellect, after he answers it, | or whether Osher only recites items he plucked | out old high school Text books and re-pastes | them here on the Usenet... ahahaha..... | >>> | Henri, your [1] assertion is purely a matter of | definition what space is supposed to represent... | Therefore... (you carry on from here, Henri)... [4] | Thanks for the laughs... hahahahahahahanson | >>> | [Henri] | "Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) wrote | You know that Androcles was employed for forty years as one | of those people who changes street light bulbs for the local council. | During wekends, he used to remove the wiring from wrecked | cars and sell the copper. He firmly believes that this makes | him a radio engineer and an expert in physics. Aww, c'mon. That was a second job when I was poor in the sixties. I won't be the first to pay his way through uni either. Besides, the copper I lifted came from burnt out electric motors and generators that I rewound and busbars that had 11,000V written on them when I had the key to the circuit breaker. Come to think of it, this submarine ( http://www.theheritagetrail.co.uk/maritime/ocelot.htm) had three sets between the batteries and the motors, I accidentally made a mistake in bending them to fit around bulkheads and had to draw new bar from ship's stores (thrice). Naturally I could not return the bad stuff, it would embarrass the Government to have to admit overestimating the cost and you can't leave it lying around for an inspector to see. It had to be dumped. I did my duty. Only a cheapskate like Wilson would bother with shitty little cars, that would be... err... WORK! | >>> | [hanson] | .. ahahahaha... But Henri, justified or not, if your emotional tirade | above, against Andro, is a continuation of [4] then that is fully | equivalent to anagrams one can produce with "Dr. Henri Wilson" = | a "Swindler Rhino" who does "howl: *Dinner, Sir*' " in the fabled | "Rider's Howl Inn" over the "Worn Dish Liner"... ahahaha... | >>> | [Henri] | < http:// www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > | [5] Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating | frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating | frame. Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects? | >>> | [hanson] | AHAHAHA.. but Henri, you do not address my inquiry [1] and [4]. | Forget... [5], the belief of relativists, Sagnac and imaginary effects. | Just enlighten me, in simple words, on my inquiry [1] and [4]. | >> | ... and don't wait for Osher. He is still weighing the probabilities. | >>ahahaha... ahahahanson | > | [Henri] | > What's that, Onnash? | > | [hanson] | ahahahaha... You are a bit slow on the uptake, Henri.. and | just copy-catting and not very imaginative to boot... AHAHA... | But "N. O'Nash" from Dublin's Raheny "Rider's Howl Inn" | might be it and get Wabnigger all exited again. | The "N" is for Noah... ahaha... | > | [Henri] | Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) | http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm | Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the | rotating frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed | from the nonrotating frame. Hahahaha! | What about all the imaginary effects? | > | [hanson] | ahahaha... But Henri, I don't wanna read the tripe in your | link that you have posted 3 times now on our twig of this | thread alone. | I assumed that you had a good case such that in a few | sentences you could explain [1] and [4] above without | resorting to the Sagnac gag. Well if you can't, Henri, | then that is cool too. Therfore I now shall turn you over | again into Andro's care for furture beatings and torments... | > | I'm sorry to do that and I know that this is not nice, but you | know how to doctor things, for you own good, Henri... | ... ahahaha... ahahaha... | Yours truly, | Noah O'Nash | > | PS: | Osher will be delighted to hear a Jewish name: "Noah". | So the probabilities will grown now exponentially for him | to explain himself... ahahaha... | | |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<qUShj.116974$036.44122@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!194.117.148.138.MISMATCH!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<0e7ee301-a95a-4d34-9ca0-34b8c8ee88b8@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <1161e622-409a-416b-bb83-8b148ea89d43@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <e0bc066d-d3cd-4725-aa57-ff85a624e23f@f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com> <Rhxhj.5953$Z61.5102@trnddc07> <Q9yhj.107666$036.70690@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <OWyhj.18862$9e1.4106@trnddc02> <crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com> <iUMhj.9$Y63.4@trnddc03> <9ggfo35lnptme7jkd4r1uua6ogslpi4bkn@4ax.com> <3aShj.1480$Zo3.830@trnddc02>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Thread: f55d3,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gidf55d3,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!194.117.148.138.MISMATCH!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Androcles" <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_d> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths References: <0e7ee301-a95a-4d34-9ca0-34b8c8ee88b8@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <1161e622-409a-416b-bb83-8b148ea89d43@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <e0bc066d-d3cd-4725-aa57-ff85a624e23f@f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com> <Rhxhj.5953$Z61.5102@trnddc07> <Q9yhj.107666$036.70690@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <OWyhj.18862$9e1.4106@trnddc02> <crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com> <iUMhj.9$Y63.4@trnddc03> <9ggfo35lnptme7jkd4r1uua6ogslpi4bkn@4ax.com> <3aShj.1480$Zo3.830@trnddc02> Subject: Re: WHY THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS CONSTANT Lines: 124 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Message-ID: <qUShj.116974$036.44122@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:24:06 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.34.70.125 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk 1200093846 82.34.70.125 (Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:24:06 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:24:06 GMT