🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:34:39 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

>Now Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> doctored  in message
>news:p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com...
>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/53d76c65c83ec84a >
>and now in news:crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com...
>and again in news:9ggfo35lnptme7jkd4r1uua6ogslpi4bkn@4ax.com...
>but still no answer to:

>>>>
>Henri, your [1] assertion is purely a matter of
>definition what space is supposed to represent...
>Therefore... (you carry on from here, Henri)... [4]
>Thanks for the laughs... hahahahahahahanson
>>>>
>[Henri]
>"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) wrote
>You know that Androcles was employed for forty years as one
>of those people who changes street light bulbs for the local council.
>During wekends, he used to remove the wiring from wrecked
>cars and sell the copper. He firmly believes that this makes
>him a radio engineer and an expert in physics.
>>>>
>[hanson]
>.. ahahahaha... But Henri,  justified or not, if your emotional tirade
>above, against Andro, is a continuation of [4] then that is fully
>equivalent to anagrams one can produce with "Dr. Henri Wilson" =
>a "Swindler Rhino" who does "howl: *Dinner, Sir*' " in the fabled
>"Rider's Howl Inn" over the "Worn Dish Liner"... ahahaha...
>>>>
>[Henri]
>< http:// www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm >
>[5] Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating
>frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating
>frame.  Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?
>>>>
>[hanson]
>AHAHAHA.. but Henri, you do not address my inquiry [1] and [4].
>Forget... [5], the belief of relativists, Sagnac and imaginary effects.
>Just enlighten me, in simple words, on my inquiry [1] and [4].
>>>
>... and don't wait for Osher. He is still weighing the probabilities.
>>>ahahaha... ahahahanson
>>
>[Henri]
>> What's that, Onnash?
>>
>[hanson]
>ahahahaha... You are a bit slow on the uptake, Henri.. and
>just copy-catting and not very imaginative to boot... AHAHA...
>But "N. O'Nash" from Dublin's Raheny "Rider's Howl Inn"
>might be it and get Wabnigger all exited again.
>The "N" is for Noah... ahaha...
>>
>[Henri]
>Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
>http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
>Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the
>rotating frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed
>from the nonrotating frame. Hahahaha!
>What about all the imaginary effects?
>>
>[hanson]
>ahahaha... But Henri, I don't wanna read the tripe in your
>link that you have posted 3 times now on our twig of this
>thread alone.
>I assumed that you had a good case such that in a few
>sentences you could explain [1] and [4] above without
>resorting to the Sagnac gag.   Well if you can't, Henri,
>then that is cool too.  Therfore I now shall turn you over
>again into Andro's care for furture beatings and torments...
>>
>I'm  sorry to do that and I know that this is not nice, but you
>know how to doctor things, for you own good, Henri...
>... ahahaha... ahahaha...
>Yours truly,
>Noah O'Nash
>>
>PS:
>Osher will be delighted to hear a Jewish name: "Noah".
>So the probabilities will grown now exponentially for him
>to explain himself... ahahaha...

But you're Noah Sn. Gord you must be old....



Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating frame. Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?