🚀 go-pugleaf

ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA... the "Sn"...ahahahah...
>
.... Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> doctored  in message
news:p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/53d76c65c83ec84a >
and now in news:crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com...
and again in news:9ggfo35lnptme7jkd4r1uua6ogslpi4bkn@4ax.com...
now wonders: news:c7pgo3lo5usta1oj2q91cp5f0p52k1lua1@4ax.com...
but still no answer to:
>
Henri, your [1] assertion is purely a matter of
definition what space is supposed to represent...
Therefore... (you carry on from here, Henri)... [4]
Thanks for the laughs... hahahahahahahanson
>>>>>
[Henri]
"Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) wrote
You know that Androcles was employed for forty years as one
of those people who changes street light bulbs for the local council.
During wekends, he used to remove the wiring from wrecked
cars and sell the copper. He firmly believes that this makes
him a radio engineer and an expert in physics.
>>>>>
[hanson]
.. ahahahaha... But Henri,  justified or not, if your emotional tirade
above, against Andro, is a continuation of [4] then that is fully
equivalent to anagrams one can produce with "Dr. Henri Wilson" =
a "Swindler Rhino" who does "howl: *Dinner, Sir*' " in the fabled
"Rider's Howl Inn" over the "Worn Dish Liner"... ahahaha...
>>>>>
[Henri]
< http:// www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm >
[5] Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating
frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating
frame.  Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?
>>>>>
[hanson]
AHAHAHA.. but Henri, you do not address my inquiry [1] and [4].
Forget... [5], the belief of relativists, Sagnac and imaginary effects.
Just enlighten me, in simple words, on my inquiry [1] and [4].
>>>>
... and don't wait for Osher. He is still weighing the probabilities.
ahahaha... ahahahanson
>>>
[Henri]
What's that, Onnash?
>>>
[hanson]
ahahahaha... You are a bit slow on the uptake, Henri.. and
just copy-catting and not very imaginative to boot... AHAHA...
But "N. O'Nash" from Dublin's Raheny "Rider's Howl Inn"
might be it and get Wabnigger all exited again.
The "N" is for Noah... ahaha...
>>>
[Henri]
Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the
rotating frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed
from the nonrotating frame. Hahahaha!
What about all the imaginary effects?
>>>
[hanson]
ahahaha... But Henri, I don't wanna read the tripe in your
link that you have posted 3 times now on our twig of this
thread alone.
I assumed that you had a good case such that in a few
sentences you could explain [1] and [4] above without
resorting to the Sagnac gag.   Well if you can't, Henri,
>>then that is cool too.  Therfore I now shall turn you over
again into Andro's care for furture beatings and torments...
>>>
I'm  sorry to do that and I know that this is not nice, but you
know how to doctor things, for you own good, Henri...
... ahahaha... ahahaha... Yours truly, Noah O'Nash
>>>
PS:
Osher will be delighted to hear a Jewish name: "Noah".
So the probabilities will grown now exponentially for him
to explain himself... ahahaha...
>
[Henri]
But you're Noah Sn. Gord you must be old....
>
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA.. Henri, Henri, Henri... To my great
chagrin you are still lacking in your powers of observations
AND interpretations, grievously.
You're hanging onto "what has been" to your full detriment.
There you go, fully disregard "Noah O'Nash", & pick out
"Sn" hoping that it will bring back "hanson".... Sheesh!
>
I agree that the world at large is full of anagrams but you can't
combine that notion with a forbidden exclusionary Eigenwert,
a "reach'n fetch for short term satisfaction" step of the 3rd kind,
and make a faulty connection to "Sn", Sn being Tin, which has
an age that reaches back to the arrival of star-stuff from the last
Supernova. Your step is positively such a severe over-reach,
that it has the potential to give you a Hernia, Henri!

The rub is that Noah is not made up of old Tin. Therefore you
must dig deeper, acknowledge & confess to yourself that your
reach for "Sn" is a desperate Freudian attempt to let "Sn"
bubble up  from the depths of your cranial innards to show
with/by/thru that shard of *Sn* that your fetish for -*S*ag*n*ac-
has you still fully in its heavy metallic grip.

"Different strokes from/by/for different folks" is proven again.
Take care Henri. Don't get a Hernia over this, for I don't want
you to come back and cry that because of me you became
Hernia-Henri now. Let's hope for the best and thanks for the
laughs... ahahaha... ahahahahanson aka Noah O'Nash.
..