Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #5877Re: WHY THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS CONSTANT
From: Androcles
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:54
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:54
118 lines
7106 bytes
7106 bytes
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message news:By7ij.2679$cz3.2573@trnddc06... | ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA... the "Sn"...ahahahah... | > | .... Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> doctored in message | news:p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com... | http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/53d76c65c83ec84a > | and now in news:crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com... | and again in news:9ggfo35lnptme7jkd4r1uua6ogslpi4bkn@4ax.com... | now wonders: news:c7pgo3lo5usta1oj2q91cp5f0p52k1lua1@4ax.com... | but still no answer to: | > | Henri, your [1] assertion is purely a matter of | definition what space is supposed to represent... | Therefore... (you carry on from here, Henri)... [4] | Thanks for the laughs... hahahahahahahanson | >>>>> | [Henri] | "Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) wrote | You know that Androcles was employed for forty years as one | of those people who changes street light bulbs for the local council. | During wekends, he used to remove the wiring from wrecked | cars and sell the copper. He firmly believes that this makes | him a radio engineer and an expert in physics. | >>>>> | [hanson] | .. ahahahaha... But Henri, justified or not, if your emotional tirade | above, against Andro, is a continuation of [4] then that is fully | equivalent to anagrams one can produce with "Dr. Henri Wilson" = | a "Swindler Rhino" who does "howl: *Dinner, Sir*' " in the fabled | "Rider's Howl Inn" over the "Worn Dish Liner"... ahahaha... | >>>>> | [Henri] | < http:// www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm > | [5] Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating | frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating | frame. Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects? | >>>>> | [hanson] | AHAHAHA.. but Henri, you do not address my inquiry [1] and [4]. | Forget... [5], the belief of relativists, Sagnac and imaginary effects. | Just enlighten me, in simple words, on my inquiry [1] and [4]. | >>>> | ... and don't wait for Osher. He is still weighing the probabilities. | ahahaha... ahahahanson | >>> | [Henri] | What's that, Onnash? | >>> | [hanson] | ahahahaha... You are a bit slow on the uptake, Henri.. and | just copy-catting and not very imaginative to boot... AHAHA... | But "N. O'Nash" from Dublin's Raheny "Rider's Howl Inn" | might be it and get Wabnigger all exited again. | The "N" is for Noah... ahaha... | >>> | [Henri] | Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T) | http://www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm | Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the | rotating frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed | from the nonrotating frame. Hahahaha! | What about all the imaginary effects? | >>> | [hanson] | ahahaha... But Henri, I don't wanna read the tripe in your | link that you have posted 3 times now on our twig of this | thread alone. | I assumed that you had a good case such that in a few | sentences you could explain [1] and [4] above without | resorting to the Sagnac gag. Well if you can't, Henri, | >>then that is cool too. Therfore I now shall turn you over | again into Andro's care for furture beatings and torments... | >>> | I'm sorry to do that and I know that this is not nice, but you | know how to doctor things, for you own good, Henri... | ... ahahaha... ahahaha... Yours truly, Noah O'Nash | >>> | PS: | Osher will be delighted to hear a Jewish name: "Noah". | So the probabilities will grown now exponentially for him | to explain himself... ahahaha... | > | [Henri] | But you're Noah Sn. Gord you must be old.... | > | [hanson] | ahahaha... AHAHAHA.. Henri, Henri, Henri... To my great | chagrin you are still lacking in your powers of observations | AND interpretations, grievously. | You're hanging onto "what has been" to your full detriment. | There you go, fully disregard "Noah O'Nash", & pick out | "Sn" hoping that it will bring back "hanson".... Sheesh! | > | I agree that the world at large is full of anagrams but you can't | combine that notion with a forbidden exclusionary Eigenwert, | a "reach'n fetch for short term satisfaction" step of the 3rd kind, | and make a faulty connection to "Sn", Sn being Tin, which has | an age that reaches back to the arrival of star-stuff from the last | Supernova. Your step is positively such a severe over-reach, | that it has the potential to give you a Hernia, Henri! | | The rub is that Noah is not made up of old Tin. Therefore you | must dig deeper, acknowledge & confess to yourself that your | reach for "Sn" is a desperate Freudian attempt to let "Sn" | bubble up from the depths of your cranial innards to show | with/by/thru that shard of *Sn* that your fetish for -*S*ag*n*ac- | has you still fully in its heavy metallic grip. | | "Different strokes from/by/for different folks" is proven again. | Take care Henri. Don't get a Hernia over this, for I don't want | you to come back and cry that because of me you became | Hernia-Henri now. Let's hope for the best and thanks for the | laughs... ahahaha... ahahahahanson aka Noah O'Nash. | .. No, ah... ha, aha, haha, ahaha, hahahaha, ahahahaha.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C18ij.125247$036.35179@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!194.117.148.138.MISMATCH!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<1161e622-409a-416b-bb83-8b148ea89d43@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <e0bc066d-d3cd-4725-aa57-ff85a624e23f@f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com> <Rhxhj.5953$Z61.5102@trnddc07> <Q9yhj.107666$036.70690@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <OWyhj.18862$9e1.4106@trnddc02> <crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com> <iUMhj.9$Y63.4@trnddc03> <9ggfo35lnptme7jkd4r1uua6ogslpi4bkn@4ax.com> <3aShj.1480$Zo3.830@trnddc02> <c7pgo3lo5usta1oj2q91cp5f0p52k1lua1@4ax.com> <By7ij.2679$cz3.2573@trnddc06>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Thread: f55d3,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,350710d8286fb30 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,gidf55d3,gid1139f8,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!194.117.148.138.MISMATCH!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Androcles" <Engineer@hogwarts.physics_d> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.philo,fr.sci.maths References: <1161e622-409a-416b-bb83-8b148ea89d43@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <e0bc066d-d3cd-4725-aa57-ff85a624e23f@f3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <p80do3h9gmrl4vojqisep15eagp5v4rjrr@4ax.com> <Rhxhj.5953$Z61.5102@trnddc07> <Q9yhj.107666$036.70690@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> <OWyhj.18862$9e1.4106@trnddc02> <crtdo35ikr0ng4s09ut5iajke8o1j6v3f4@4ax.com> <iUMhj.9$Y63.4@trnddc03> <9ggfo35lnptme7jkd4r1uua6ogslpi4bkn@4ax.com> <3aShj.1480$Zo3.830@trnddc02> <c7pgo3lo5usta1oj2q91cp5f0p52k1lua1@4ax.com> <By7ij.2679$cz3.2573@trnddc06> Subject: Re: WHY THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS CONSTANT Lines: 119 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Message-ID: <C18ij.125247$036.35179@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:54:26 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.34.70.125 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk 1200164066 82.34.70.125 (Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:54:26 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:54:26 GMT