🚀 go-pugleaf

The money-spinner called "Divine Albert's Divine Theory" presupposes
constant shock and horror in Einstein zombie world - otherwise
Einstein zombie world may forget Divine Albert's Divine Theory and
forgetting Divine Albert's Divine Theory is much more dangerous than
refuting Divine Albert's Divine Theory. However in the good old days
criminal Einsteinians were much bolder:

http://www.totse.com/en/technology/space_astronomy_nasa/ftltravl.html
[From "The Sunday Times" (UK) 13th August 1995]
ASTRONOMERS PREDICT FASTER THAN LIGHT SPACE TRAVEL
"It is boldly going where no reputable scientific body has gone
before.
Contradicting Einstein, the normally conservative Royal Astronomical
Society is about to publish a report predicting that mankind will be
able
to travel faster than the speed of light. The breakthrough means that
Star Trek fantasies of interstellar civilisations and voyages powered
by warp drive are now no longer the exclusive domain of science
fiction writers. The report was written by Ian Crawford, an astronomer
at University College London, who believes not only that man will one
day see stars at close quarters, but that we had better start
preparing ourselves for the consequences, including contact with
aliens. His paper, Some Thoughts On The Implications Of Faster-Than-
Light Travel, has been validated by independent referees in the
scientific community and will be published next month. Its publication
coincides with the formation by British and American scientists of the
Interstellar Propulsion Society (IPS) which is dedicated to finding a
means of taking astronauts to the stars. Crawford argues that modern
physics may allow two possible ways around Einstein's theory.....Sir
Martin Rees, the astronomer royal and professor of astronomy at
Cambridge University, was more cautious, however, saying the proofs
were purely theoretical."

Note the contribution of the astronomer royal Martin Rees: proofs are
"purely theoretical".  Then the astronomer royal became an important
boss in Einstein criminal cult and the "purely theoretical" proofs
disappeared forever:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2005/01/26/ecrein26.xml&sSheet=/connected/2005/01/26/
Martin Rees: "Although there's something rather noble about the way he
persevered in his attempts to reach far beyond his grasp, in some
respects the Einstein cult sends the wrong signal. It unduly exalts
"armchair theory", which by itself would achieve little."

Where are the "purely theoretical" proofs of the "two possible ways
around Einstein's theory", Martin Rees?

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com