🚀 go-pugleaf

On 6 Jan, 10:22, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2007, 10:15, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > An international team of leading philosophers and physicists:
>
> >http://www.routledge-philosophy.com/books/Einstein-Relativity-and-Abs...
> > "Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity is an anthology of
> > original essays by an international team of leading philosophers and
> > physicists who, on the centenary of Albert Einsteins Special Theory of
> > Relativity, come together in this volume to reassess the contemporary
> > paradigm of the relativistic concept of time."
>
> > A distinguished member of the international team of leading
> > philosophers and physicists:
>
> >http://philosophy.ucsd.edu/faculty/ccallender/
> > "On Finding 'Real' Time in Quantum Mechanics" (draft) Absolute Simultaneity. (Eds) W.L. Craig and Q. Smith. NY: Oxford University
> > Press, 2007.
> > Craig Callender: "In my opinion, by far the best way for the tenser to
> > respond to Putnam et al is to adopt the Lorentz 1915 interpretation of
> > time dilation and Fitzgerald contraction.1  Lorentz attributed these
> > effects (and hence the famous null results regarding an aether) to the
> > Lorentz invariance of the dynamical laws governing matter and
> > radiation, not to spacetime structure.  On this view, Lorentz
> > invariance is not a spacetime symmetry but a dynamical symmetry, and
> > the special relativistic effects of dilation and contraction are not
> > purely kinematical.  The background spacetime is Newtonian or neo-
> > Newtonian, not Minkowskian.  Both Newtonian and neo-Newtonian
> > spacetime include a globalabsolutesimultaneityamong their invariant
> > structures (with Newtonian spacetime singling out one of neo-Newtonian
> > spacetime's many preferred inertial frames as the rest frame).  On
> > this picture, there is no relativity ofsimultaneityand spacetime is
> > uniquely decomposable into space and time."
>
> > The problem is not that leading philosophers and physicists claim
> > there is no relativity ofsimultaneity. Leading philosophers and
> > physicists are just looking for a new money-spinner that does not
> > involve Einstein's idiocies. The problem is that there is NO REACTION
> > in Einstein zombie world. Science has died. Irreversibly.
>
> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0604/0604010v1.pdf
> Absolute simultaneity: Special relativity without light signals or
> synchronised clocks, J.H.Field, Departement de Physique Nucleaire et
> Corpusculaire, Universite de Geneve, E-mail: john.fi...@cern.ch
> "Using only the reciprocity postulate, it is demonstrated that the
> spatial separation of two objects, at rest in some inertial frame, is
> invariant. This result holds in both Galilean and special relativity.
> A corollary is that there are no "length contraction" or associated
> "relativity of simultaneity" effects in the latter theory."
>
> Incredible. NO REACTION in Einstein zombie world. Science has died.
> Irreversibly.
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Dear Pentcho

Are you an Eintstein bruiser, a jew basher, or just out to bash
anyboby who believes in tested science?.
What exactly is your motive here?
I am guessing you just looking for attention, give your mummy a call.