🚀 go-pugleaf

On Dec 9, 18:21, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
> AKG...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Dec 7, 10:01 am, "Sptth" <sp...@isp.com> wrote:
> >> "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
> >>[...]
>
> > All of this bizzare opinion could have been avoided if the author did
> > study Karl Popper. [...]
>
> The person to whom you are responding is a well-known idiot who
> repeatedly posts the same nonsense (and name-shifts to avoid killfiles,
> indicating he knows full well how stupid he is being). He claims "there
> have been no objective rebuttals" for the simple reason that he never
> discusses it in a rational manner. As you point out, a bit of study of
> real physics and philosophy of science would dispel his misconceptions.
>
> Tom Roberts

Roberts Roberts don't be so cruel. The idiocies you and your brothers
in Einstein criminal cult publish are such that "non-idiotic"
criticism is almost impossible. Imagine a professor claiming that the
greenness of the crocodile exceeds its length. What could an opponent
reply? That it is the length that exceeds the greenness? Then the
opponent is the same idiot. That the professor's claim is an idiocy?
Then the opponent is defined as a troll, crank etc.

If you think that the crocodile example is too distant from the
"science" you and your criminal brothers create just consider two
claims made by you and a French brother of yours called Jean-Marc Levy-
Leblond:

http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/onemorederivation.pdf
Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "The evidence of the nonzero mass of the
photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the
special relativity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations
which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity."

http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/8034dc146100e32c
Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a
nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant
speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both
Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains
of applicability would be reduced)."

Do you see any essential difference between your science and the
crocodile science Roberts Roberts?

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com