🚀 go-pugleaf

On 19 nov, 07:51, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 19 Nov, 05:24, Peri of Pera <rie...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
> sci.physics.relativity:
>
> > How many relativistic frames are involved when we observe or deal with
> > space muons in the atmosphere? Are we in an observer frame and the
> > muons in an observed frame? If so what are the mathematical and
> > logical relationships between these two frames?
> > Peter Riedt
>
> What is crucial in this case is the definition of "muons at rest".
> When the lifetime "at rest" is measured, by "at rest" Einstein
> criminal cult mean a crash undergone by the muon in which its speed
> changes from about 300000km/s to zero. That crash is so terrible that
> the muon "dies" quickly, much more quickly than muons that have not
> undergone the crash:
>
> http://web.mit.edu/c_hill/www/muons_paper.pdf
> "In this experiment, we measure two of the basic properties of the
> muon, namely, its mean lifetime and mass in its rest frame. We measure
> the decay curve of cosmic-ray muons that have come to rest in a
> plastic scintillator by looking for electrons produced in their
> decay."
>
> Einsteinians have stopped referring to this "proof" of time dilation
> for a year or so. But it is present in all textbooks so zombie
> education remains unaffected.
>
> Pentcho Valev
***************************
Sais-tu que sur un site francophone tu peux également t'exprimer
en langue française?
D'autre part, crois-tu nécessaire un tel crosspostage?
(sci.physics.relativity,  sci.physics,  sci.astro,  fr.sci.physique,
fr.sci.maths)
C'est peut-être un peu polluant, isn't it!?

Alain  (fr.sci.maths)