🚀 go-pugleaf

Koobee Wublee wrote:
> 
> On Nov 14, 1:30 pm, Laurent wrote:
> > On Nov 14, 2:06 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
> 
> > > Under the mathematics of the Lorentz transform, absolute simultaneity
> > > is forbidden.  The mathematical manifestation of the Lorentz transform
> > > is the combination of time dilation and the principle of relativity.
> > > Poincare had already identified this as relative simultaneity.
> > > Relative simultaneity is the root cause of the twin's paradox.  Under
> > > the concept of relative simultaneity, any interference pattern cannot
> > > happen.  The interferometers should not have worked.  Since
> > > interferometers work so well and everytime ever so consistently, the
> > > most logical conclusion is that relative simultaneity must not
> > > possibly be valid.  This also means the Lorentz transform must be
> > > wrong.
> >
> > Not what GPS technology seems to suggest. Same with interplanetary
> > travel. GTR is a proven fact. Sorry.
> 
> There are other hypotheses that predict the same result.  <shrug>
> 
> Besides, it is not conclusive that GPS utilizes GR to do so.  To do
> that, it requires a ground-to-satellite synchronization.  This is just
> too costly and too error-prone.  In addition to the error associated
> with downlink from satellite to the ground, there is just too much
> error compared to satellite-to-satellite synchronization.
[snip crap]

   1) Idiot.
   2) Relativistic effects on orbital clocks
<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2003-1&page=node5.html>
   3) Idiot
   4) Lithium ions as clocks at 0.06c to 10^(-7) accuracy
<http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/1113/2>
   5) Idiot.
   6) Ineducable idiot.

-- 
Uncle Al 
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ 
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) 
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2