🚀 go-pugleaf

"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message 
news:473C984F.6EDA3A2@hate.spam.net...
:   1) Idiot.

Fuckhead.

:   2) Relativistic effects on orbital clocks
: 
<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2003-1&page=node5.html>
:   3) Idiot

Dumbfuck.


:   4) Lithium ions as clocks at 0.06c to 10^(-7) accuracy
: <http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2007/1113/2>
:   5) Idiot.

Arsehole.

:   6) Ineducable idiot.

Useless arsehole.

Catch 22:
  http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
  http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img76.gif


Heller wrote: "There was only one catch and that was Catch 22, which
specified that a concern for one's safety in the face of dangers that were
real and immediate was the process of a rational mind.
"Orr (a character in the novel) was crazy and could be grounded. All he had
to do was ask, and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would
have to fly more missions.

"Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he
was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have
to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to."

In Einstein's case if you use c+v you can derive c = (c+v)/(1+v/c) from
the cuckoo malformations he blamed on Lorentz. That says you can't
use c+v.

What troll kooks like Schwartz, Poe, McCullough, Roberts, Draper, Lawrence,
Andersen et. al. fail to realise is the existence of isomorphism
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism
between Sagnac's real experiment and Einstein's hallucination experiment,
shown here:
 http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/TwoSpeedRack.gif
Einstein sends light along the rack and back again, the rack
moving at velocity v in his pipe dream.
Sagnac sends the light around the gear wheel for real.
If you analyse one you should get the same result as the other, but
you cannot use SR to derive SR, that is  petitio principii, circularity.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

c+v is essential to the derivation of the cuckoo malformations, the
part where Einstein screws up is:
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO. -- Rabbi Albert Einstein

 http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/tAB=tBA.gif

Here are some mathematical proofs:
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof

Not included are
Proof by "because I say so",
Proof by "everybody knows",
Proof by "it is written",
the three most popular forms used in sci.physics.relativity.

You'll often see this pathetic mob muttering "Lorentz Transformations"
but they haven't a clue how they are derived and faithfully follow their
indoctrination like lemmings.

Catch 22:
  http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img22.gif
  http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img76.gif

Prediction:
 The troll kooks will ignore it, they are too stooopid to understand a 
proof.






: -- 
: Uncle Al
: http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
: (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
: http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
No brain.