🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6142

Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?

#6142
From: Igor
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:43
48 lines
3457 bytes
On Nov 13, 8:39 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 13 Nov, 15:15, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dl...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Pentcho Valev:
>
> > "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > >http://ias.umn.edu/pdf/TimeandRelativity-Pooley.pdf
> > > p. 11: "Problem for Lorentz's theory: no sign of ether
> > > drift (= motion of ether with respect to earth). Many
> > > failed attempts to detect ether drift, one of the most
> > > famous ones by Americans Albert A. Michelson
> > > (1852-1931) and Edward W. Morley (1838-1923).
> > > Explanation: compensating effect: length of
> > > interferometer arm changes as it rotates: parallel to
> > > ether drift it is shorter than perpendicular to the ether
> > > drift.  Contraction (deformation) hypothesis: an
> > > object moving with a velocity v through the ether
> > > contracts by a factor (1-v^2 c^2)^(1/2) in the
> > > direction of motion."
>
> > > Another explanation that essentially could have
> > > been advanced by FitzGerald, Lorentz etc. if they
> > > had been less prejudiced in favour of the ether theory:
>
> > >http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001743/02/Norton.pdf
> > > John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley
> > > experiment as evidence for the principle of relativity,
> > > whereas later writers almost universally use it as
> > > support for the light postulate of special relativity......
> > >THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY
> > > COMPATIBLE WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF
> > > LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE."
>
> > You forgot:
> > - the aether was dragged by the Earth, and so consequently the
> > motion of light was conformed to the motion of the Earth.
>
> Zombie know, zombie say, zombie kill heretic, zombie become professor.
>
> Pentcho Valev

I wasn't aware that you were a professor.  A professor of what,
exactly?
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1194990181.396054.213470@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <5rh_i.5662$4k.2057@newsfe11.phx> <1194961193.992672.222080@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e1ebd9321ee85e88
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gid10b271,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  Igor <thoovler@excite.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,sci.physics
Subject: Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:43:01 -0000
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <1194990181.396054.213470@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
   <5rh_i.5662$4k.2057@newsfe11.phx>
   <1194961193.992672.222080@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.205.191.53
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1194990181 4676 127.0.0.1 (13 Nov 2007 21:43:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:43:01 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <1194961193.992672.222080@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=128.205.191.53;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0