Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6142Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY?
From: Igor
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:43
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:43
48 lines
3457 bytes
3457 bytes
On Nov 13, 8:39 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 13 Nov, 15:15, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <dl...@cox.net> wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Pentcho Valev: > > > "Pentcho Valev" <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >http://ias.umn.edu/pdf/TimeandRelativity-Pooley.pdf > > > p. 11: "Problem for Lorentz's theory: no sign of ether > > > drift (= motion of ether with respect to earth). Many > > > failed attempts to detect ether drift, one of the most > > > famous ones by Americans Albert A. Michelson > > > (1852-1931) and Edward W. Morley (1838-1923). > > > Explanation: compensating effect: length of > > > interferometer arm changes as it rotates: parallel to > > > ether drift it is shorter than perpendicular to the ether > > > drift. Contraction (deformation) hypothesis: an > > > object moving with a velocity v through the ether > > > contracts by a factor (1-v^2 c^2)^(1/2) in the > > > direction of motion." > > > > Another explanation that essentially could have > > > been advanced by FitzGerald, Lorentz etc. if they > > > had been less prejudiced in favour of the ether theory: > > > >http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001743/02/Norton.pdf > > > John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley > > > experiment as evidence for the principle of relativity, > > > whereas later writers almost universally use it as > > > support for the light postulate of special relativity...... > > >THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY > > > COMPATIBLE WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF > > > LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." > > > You forgot: > > - the aether was dragged by the Earth, and so consequently the > > motion of light was conformed to the motion of the Earth. > > Zombie know, zombie say, zombie kill heretic, zombie become professor. > > Pentcho Valev I wasn't aware that you were a professor. A professor of what, exactly?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1194990181.396054.213470@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <5rh_i.5662$4k.2057@newsfe11.phx> <1194961193.992672.222080@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: f74ae,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: 1139f8,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Thread: 10b271,e1ebd9321ee85e88 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gidf74ae,gidfa4c1,gid1139f8,gid10b271,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Igor <thoovler@excite.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.maths,sci.physics Subject: Re: NO SIGN OF ETHER DRIFT: WHY? Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:43:01 -0000 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 50 Message-ID: <1194990181.396054.213470@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <1194938024.903129.206100@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <5rh_i.5662$4k.2057@newsfe11.phx> <1194961193.992672.222080@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.205.191.53 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1194990181 4676 127.0.0.1 (13 Nov 2007 21:43:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:43:01 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1194961193.992672.222080@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=128.205.191.53; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0