🚀 go-pugleaf

"Pentcho Valev" <pvalev@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1194075281.414130.170880@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9412/9412064v1.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9412/9412064v1.pdf
WAS EINSTEIN 100% RIGHT? Thibault Damour: "However, some
recent theoretical findings (existence of non-perturbative strong-field
effects, natural cosmological attraction toward zero scalar couplings)
suggest that the present agreement between Einstein's theory and
experiment might be a RED HERRING...
>
>
[hanson]
.... because as long as GR uses in each & every one of its "solutions"
the venerable and humble "G" of Newton,  GR remains a crock o'shit,
a con and the preferred sex attractant for Einstein's Dingleberries
to engage in their mental masturbations over it  and present  their
ejaculates in arxiv.org... ahahahahaha... The much maligned bearer of
truth and not so glad tidings for the Einstein Dingleberries, poster
Androcles has illustrated and highlighted WHY the sickly Einstein-con
and its contrived experiments for REL do always seem to be a lovely
manufactured but phony agreement. See here:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/MC2.htm
>
Since the Criminal cult... ahahaha...  of the  Einstein Dingleberries is
a deeply religious fundamentalist lot in regards to physics, not mine
nor your comments, Pentcho, will  or canshake their faith...  The Pope,
the Imam or the Grand Rabbi do envy the religious zeal, the devotion
and fanatizism that these disciples aka Einstein's  Dingleberries
do exhibit... Thanks for the laughs.....   ahahahaha... ahahanson
>
>
[Valev]
...and provide new motivations for improving the experimental tests
of gravity.....General Relativity can be thought of as defined by
two postulates. One postulate states that the action
functional describing the propagation and self-interaction
of the gravitational field is......A second postulate states that the
action functional describing the coupling of all the (fermionic and
bosonic) fields describing matter and its electro-weak and strong
interactions is a (minimal) deformation of the special relativistic
action functional used by particle physicists (the so called "Standard
Model"), obtained by replacing......."

Thibault Damour wouldn't know but cleverer hypnotists in Einstein
criminal cult do know that, apart from the postulates explicitly
stated, there are always implicit premises that can (then
"conclusions" would be better than "premises") or cannot be derived
from the official postulates. In any case those premises should be
made explicit sooner or later, especially if they are important. In my
view, there can be nothing more important than the following two
premises:

1. In a gravitational field, the speed of light varies with the
gravitational potential V in accordance with Einstein's 1911 equation
c'=c(1+V/c^2). Equivalently, in the absence of a gravitational field,
the speed of light varies with the relative speed of the light source
and the observer v, in accordance with the equation c'=c+v.

2. In a gravitational field, the speed of light does not vary with the
gravitational potential and accordingly obeys the equation c'=c.
Equivalently, in the absence of a gravitational field, the speed of
light does not vary with the relative speed of the light source and
the observer and again obeys the equation c'=c.

When dealing with general relativity, hypnotists in Einstein criminal
cult may use Premise (1), Premise (2), both, neither etc. They will
have to explain what they use sooner or later.

Pentcho Valev
>