Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6332INCONSISTENCY IN CLASSICAL ELECTROSTATICS
From: Pentcho Valev
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:54
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:54
35 lines
2980 bytes
2980 bytes
The theory is based on the assumption that all of the forces are CONSERVATIVE: W. Panofsky, M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism, Addison- Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1962): p.96: "By assembling these charges we have changed the energy of the system, and since all of the forces are conservative, we can identify this expression for the work of assembly with the energy of the system." p.102: "The resultant energy expression is nevertheless general, since no nonconservative forces are involved." p.103: "We must remember that the only physical fact underlying this discussion is Coulomb's law, the remainder of the discusion being mathematical, and therefore we cannot expect to obtain any physical concept regarding the mechanical interaction of charges which will add any physical facts beyond Coulomb's law." Yet the fact that NONCONSERVATIVE forces are unavoidably involved is implicitly taken into account: W. Panofsky, M. Phillips, Classical Electricity and Magnetism, Addison- Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1962): p.100: "Thus we cannot equate the increment of the work done... to the increase in total energy, since heat transfers are also involved." p.115: "Therefore the decrease in force⦠cannot be explained by electrical forces alone." pp.115-116: "Thus the decrease in force that is experienced between two charges when they are immersed in a dielectric liquid can be understood only by considering the effect of the pressure of the liquid on the charges themselves. In accordance with the philosophy of the action-at-a-distance theory, no change in the purely electrical interaction between the charges takes place." Pentcho Valev pvalev@yahoo.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6995b3bc-be2b-4ebe-8372-8578caaf24b1@k26g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k26g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 2479375fed,6ef43db8f5fcc7d9,start X-Google-Attributes: gid2479375fed,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k26g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,fr.sci.physique Subject: INCONSISTENCY IN CLASSICAL ELECTROSTATICS Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 35 Message-ID: <6995b3bc-be2b-4ebe-8372-8578caaf24b1@k26g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.215.201.48 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1253541279 4612 127.0.0.1 (21 Sep 2009 13:54:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k26g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.215.201.48; posting-account=Lz-LbgoAAABPDavKeW-eYeobwLHD_cvQ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)