Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6513Re: CRITICIZING DEAD SCIENCE
From: Sam Wormley
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:17
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:17
26 lines
2575 bytes
2575 bytes
Dennis Sue... wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2:57 am, "Whoever" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>> No .. the correct answer is d) that SR and GR do both explain it. And get
>> identical results.
>
> The results are neither rational nor identical.
> They are refuted in rigorous analysis.
Dennis Sue would do well to pick one frame and stick with it.
Relativity theory and observation agree with each other beautifully.
>
> On Einstein's resolution of the twin clock paradox.
> --C. S. Unnikrishnan.
> Gravitation Group,
> Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
> http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/dec252005/2009.pdf
>
> How much of the "Kool-aid" did you drink? ;-)
Physics FAQ: The Twin Paradox
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/TwinParadox/twin_paradox.html
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<lauXl.137889$DP1.94187@attbi_s22>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<7cfdc4b5-527f-4a33-b098-f68a8f4f6053@w40g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4A19EB7F.82C9A12F@hate.spam.net> <f2b70e73-cd44-4ad9-a3a2-0c06a47eaf22@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <e0a8ab04-6d4f-4f4c-a9ac-5dd2d9ac569d@m19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <66418ee8-53b8-43d5-a255-d024c2db3b93@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <ce873e2c-7fa3-4c17-b85e-7798c84730eb@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <6b67d64c-278a-4cfe-8fbf-55d7ec03e544@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <66ac4c8f-1388-49bd-9cd8-a1060800fbd3@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <78cd5143-5c07-41a8-b20d-a24bf7dbea04@e21g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <0049e28e$0$9754$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <ba0d9db1-6c34-46e2-95f9-ffe22c1568a4@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 2479375fed,ddc899b5bb68f231 X-Google-Attributes: gid2479375fed,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s22.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique Subject: Re: CRITICIZING DEAD SCIENCE References: <7cfdc4b5-527f-4a33-b098-f68a8f4f6053@w40g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4A19EB7F.82C9A12F@hate.spam.net> <f2b70e73-cd44-4ad9-a3a2-0c06a47eaf22@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <e0a8ab04-6d4f-4f4c-a9ac-5dd2d9ac569d@m19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <66418ee8-53b8-43d5-a255-d024c2db3b93@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <ce873e2c-7fa3-4c17-b85e-7798c84730eb@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <6b67d64c-278a-4cfe-8fbf-55d7ec03e544@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <66ac4c8f-1388-49bd-9cd8-a1060800fbd3@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <78cd5143-5c07-41a8-b20d-a24bf7dbea04@e21g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <0049e28e$0$9754$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <ba0d9db1-6c34-46e2-95f9-ffe22c1568a4@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <ba0d9db1-6c34-46e2-95f9-ffe22c1568a4@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 27 Message-ID: <lauXl.137889$DP1.94187@attbi_s22> NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.26.207.14 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s22 1244557073 173.26.207.14 (Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:17:53 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:17:53 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:17:53 GMT