🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #6643

Re: WHO IS WELCOME TO TRY TO KILL SPECIAL RELATIVITY?

#6643
From: bobd
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:46
71 lines
6246 bytes
Einstein's Equations work well for certain applications like GPS. For
others they do not. When it was found that certain galaxies in the
universe had a stronger gravitational attraction than they should when
all the mass was accounted for the term "dark matter" was invented.
There is no proof of dark matter except that it has been invented to
explain abnomalies in Einsteins theory. Dark matter has never been
found in the lab. Gravity is not entirely dependant on mass.

Abnomalies with the Einstein gravity theory:
Unexplained increase of momentum in sling-shot manouvers performed in
space.
The earth is moving away from the sun at a greater rate than can be
accounted for by the sun loosing mass alone.
Unexplained speed of the pioneer space craft now at the edge of the
solar system.
The abnomaly in the moon's orbit when the sun earth and moon line up
in that order.(Bet all you PhD's have never heard of this one, it's
buried under a ton of concrete but it's there! Will provide a link if
required)

Modern physics is not a love of the truth like the classical physics
before the 1905, but a love of the power and the prestiege of those in
high positions. Any change in the status quo(ala Eintein) and these
men would loose the power they love so dearly. Many a respected
scientist has proclaimed that Einstein was wrong and this has killed
their reputation over night, baring them from ever publishing their
work again.

Circa 1889 Two physicists by the name of Michelson-Morley carried out
an experiment not to find a absolute frame of reference as modern
publications would have us believe but to detect the existance of the
"aether" a substance that was alleged to fill all space. Waves in the
"aether" were thought to be electromagnetic waves and Gravity,
Magnetism and electrostatic forces were forces of the aether to.
Aether particles or atherons were calculated to be 4000 times smaller
than the Hydrogen atom and thus freely penetrate all matter
interacting with it. The Michelson-Morley experiment used light beams
to detect the "aether wind" as the earth moved through it. The result
was a negative. The aether idea was not abandoned at first as a
Mathmatician by the name of Lorentz developed what was to be called
Lorentz contractions. This stated that objects moving through the
aether would have there physical properties altered so that it
appeared there was a negative result but actually there wasn't. He was
wrong. Circa the 1930's a french scientist by the name of Sagnac
detected the aether. It wasn't the aether wind as first thought, no,
the aether was being dragged around the earth by the interaction of
the aether and mass. Aether under strain causes force on mass and the
opposite is true also. This also explains the GPS-Relativity situation
as if you have a ball spinning in a fluid the fluid will spin faster
at the surface of the ball than that a greater distance. Density of
the fluid will change also. They say the simplest explanation is
always the correct one and I hold that the above is true to this
saying also.

Someone asked me, "If there is a substance through all space then why
can't see it". I replied, "If you are looking through a perfectly
clear window why can't you see that also? Because it is the medium the
light travel through." Yes the aether refracts light to. The aether
about the sun is at a different density to the rest of the solar
system so light is refracted near it's surface. This was labelled by
Einstein as "gravitational attraction of light" and the calculations
for it were perfected by Newton, Euler and Laplace? long before
Einstein was even born. I was also asked by the same person "why can't
we feel this aether". I replied, "Can't we??? How do you account for
inertia and momentum without some sort of substance interacting with
the mass."


Countless others agree that Einstein was wrong, why even Steven
Hawking and Sir Martin Ree's.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/519406/posts
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4adca1fe-ac47-45d4-b5d6-7b88de324fd8@x29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!x29g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <9e883454-77be-40b1-bb4f-6a931524a642@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <q1YMl.689559$yE1.210848@attbi_s21> <584dba75-a7a7-42e0-a9c3-c2582cd8a9ca@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <enYMl.689575$yE1.70316@attbi_s21> <a288ca82-c012-4920-8740-0bb483e549ef@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> <02e593d6-10a9-489a-84e9-85c060bdd15a@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <9bdf8366-94eb-4578-a7e0-d1172df4b18f@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <366Nl.690221$yE1.509275@attbi_s21> <e369444c-e717-4b85-8a3c-3373f017f02d@r36g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <Vv6Ol.98242$DP1.4189@attbi_s22> <62694a22-e5f4-415b-98ca-aaff4ec6ea29@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <4bgOl.98860$DP1.46779@attbi_s22> <8e184215-0044-48b9-9381-ea39be325f28@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <1c780380-6b6c-4098-80a1-005dc8afab0e@z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <4204180d-1532-4c48-9b6d-2db6134327b7@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: d820f4ac3c,38d3295f03581644
X-Google-Attributes: gidd820f4ac3c,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!x29g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: bobd <clark.r.daniel@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,sci.astro,alt.philosophy
Subject: Re: WHO IS WELCOME TO TRY TO KILL SPECIAL RELATIVITY?
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <4adca1fe-ac47-45d4-b5d6-7b88de324fd8@x29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <9e883454-77be-40b1-bb4f-6a931524a642@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com> 
 <q1YMl.689559$yE1.210848@attbi_s21> <584dba75-a7a7-42e0-a9c3-c2582cd8a9ca@l28g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
 <enYMl.689575$yE1.70316@attbi_s21> <a288ca82-c012-4920-8740-0bb483e549ef@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>
 <02e593d6-10a9-489a-84e9-85c060bdd15a@r34g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
 <9bdf8366-94eb-4578-a7e0-d1172df4b18f@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
 <366Nl.690221$yE1.509275@attbi_s21> <e369444c-e717-4b85-8a3c-3373f017f02d@r36g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>
 <Vv6Ol.98242$DP1.4189@attbi_s22> <62694a22-e5f4-415b-98ca-aaff4ec6ea29@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
 <4bgOl.98860$DP1.46779@attbi_s22> <8e184215-0044-48b9-9381-ea39be325f28@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
 <1c780380-6b6c-4098-80a1-005dc8afab0e@z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <4204180d-1532-4c48-9b6d-2db6134327b7@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.37.96.11
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1242164809 22539 127.0.0.1 (12 May 2009 21:46:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:46:49 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x29g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.37.96.11; 
 posting-account=OSjGqgoAAAABC5tZZiqdqGUm4lEzsqHF
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) 
 Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 webmail.tait.co.nz:3128 (squid/2.5.STABLE3)