🚀 go-pugleaf

On 20 mar, 08:51, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Beautiful dead science and doublethink:
>
> The truth: Maxwell's theory says the speed of light does not depend on
> the speed of the emitter but does depend on the speed of the observer:
>
> http://www.solidarity-us.org/node/58
> "Maxwell's theory of electricity and magnetism provides a successful
> framework with which to study light.  In this theory light is an
> electromagnetic wave.  Using Maxwell's equations one can compute the
> speed of light.  One finds that the speed of light is 300,000,000
> meters (186,000 miles) per second. The question arises: which inertial
> observer is this speed of light relative to?  As in the previous
> paragraph, two inertial observers traveling relative to each other
> should observe DIFFERENT SPEEDS FOR THE SAME LIGHT WAVE."
>
> http://www.futura-sciences.com/fr/doc/t/physique/d/relativite-restrei...
> "Les équations de Maxwell prévoyaient la propagation de la lumière à
> la vitesse de 300.000 km/s par rapport à l'éther. Or, si l'on cherche
> à calculer la vitesse de la lumière par rapport à un référentiel qui
> est lui-même mobile dans l'éther, on observe que la lumière se propage
> avec une vitesse différente..."
>
> http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/companion.doc
> John Norton: "Einstein's second postulate, the light postulate,
> asserts that "light is always propagated in empty space with a
> definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the
> emitting body." Einstein gave no justification for this postulate in
> the introduction to his paper. Its strongest justification came from
> Maxwell's electrodynamics. That theory had identified light with waves
> propagating in an electromagnetic field and concluded that just one
> speed was possible for them in empty space, c = 300,000 km/sec, no
> matter what the motion of the emitter."
>
> The lie (always one leap ahead of the truth): Maxwell's theory says
> the speed of light is absolute and does not depend on the speed of the
> observer:
>
> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/relatvty.htm
> Relativity Tutorial: "But 200 years after Newton the theory of
> electromagnetism was developed into Maxwell's equations. These
> equations describe waves with a speed of 1/sqrt(epsilon_o*mu_o), where
> epsilon_o is the constant describing the strength of the electrostatic
> force in a vacuum, and mu_o is the constant describing the strength of
> the magnetic interaction in a vacuum. This is an absolute velocity --
> it is not relative to anything."
>
> http://sampit.geol.sc.edu/Doppler.html
> "Moving observer: A man is standing on the beach, watching the tide.
> The waves are washing into the shore and over his feet with a constant
> frequency and wavelength. However, if he begins walking out into the
> ocean, the waves will begin hitting him more frequently, leading him
> to perceive that the wavelength of the waves has decreased. Again,
> this phenomenon is due to the fact that the source and the observer
> are not the in the same frame of reference. Although the wavelength
> appears to have decreased to the man, the wavelength would appear
> constant to a jellyfish floating along with the tide."
>
> http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/big_bang/ind...
> John Norton: "Here's a light wave and an observer. If the observer
> were to hurry towards the source of the light, the observer would now
> pass wavecrests more frequently than the resting observer. That would
> mean that moving observer would find the frequency of the light to
> have increased (AND CORRESPONDINGLY FOR THE WAVELENGTH - THE DISTANCE
> BETWEEN CRESTS - TO HAVE DECREASED)."
>
> http://www.math.mcgill.ca/lseguin/physique.php
> "Donc, Maxwell se demanda: "Mais pourquoi donc mes paramètres
> correspondent-ils à la vitesse de la lumière ?" Et il fit des calculs
> palpitants pendant longtemps. Après des heures de plaisir, il trouva
> que ses équations prédisaient une vitesse c pour les ondes
> électromagnétiques (la lumière par exemple) et que cette vitesse c
> était une constante, peut importe le référentiel. Donc, peut importe
> qui mesure la vitesse de la lumière, ça sera toujours c."
>
> http://www.techno-science.net/?onglet=glossaire&definition=1711
> "D'après les théories de la physique moderne, et notamment les
> équations de Maxwell, la lumière visible et toutes les ondes
> électromagnétiques ont une vitesse constante dans le vide, la vitesse
> de la lumière. On la considère donc comme une constante physique notée
> c (du latin celeritas, « vitesse »). Mais elle n'est pas seulement
> constante (pense-t-on) en tous les endroits (et à tous les âges) de
> l'univers (principes cosmologiques faible et fort, respectivement) ;
> elle l'est également d'un repère inertiel à un autre (principe
> d'équivalence restreint). En d'autres termes : quel que soit le repère
> inertiel de référence d'un observateur ou la vitesse de l'objet
> émettant la lumière, tout observateur obtiendra la même mesure."
>
> Definition of doublethink:
>
> http://www.liferesearchuniversal.com/1984-17.html#seventeen
> George Orwell: "Doublethink means the power of holding two
> contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both
> of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories
> must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with
> reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself
> that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it
> would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to
> be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and
> hence of guilt. Doublethink lies at the very heart of Ingsoc, since
> the essential act of the Party is to use conscious deception while
> retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To
> tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any
> fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary
> again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed,
> to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take
> account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably
> necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to
> exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is
> tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this
> knowledge ; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead
> of the truth."
>
> http://www.liferesearchuniversal.com/1984-17.html#seventeen
> George Orwell: "It need hardly be said that the subtlest practitioners
> of doublethink are those who invented doublethink and know that it is
> a vast system of mental cheating. In our society, those who have the
> best knowledge of what is happening are also those who are furthest
> from seeing the world as it is. In general, the greater the
> understanding, the greater the delusion ; the more intelligent, the
> less sane."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

Degage petasse.

Y.B.