🚀 go-pugleaf

Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in message 
> 495f2855$0$201$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
>> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
>>> Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>>  495e8d0e$0$183$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
>>>> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
>>>>> Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in
>>>>> message 
>>>>> 495df611$0$198$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
>>>>>> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
>>>>>>> Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in
>>>>>>>  message 
>>>>>>> 495d1c8a$0$201$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
>>>>>>>> lucien.coste wrote:
>>>>>>>>> et le temps que tu perds et celui que
>>>>>>>>> tu fais perdre aux autres par ta
>>>>>>>>> manie haineuse, injuste et totalement
>>>>>>>>> peinte d'incomp�tence... ce temps-l�
>>>>>>>>> tu as l'air de l'oublier
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Lucien COSTE
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Pour moi, les liens que Pentcho apporte
>>>>>>>>  sont tr�s interessantes.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Pas de surprise.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But you do not read them, so they are
>>>>>> wasted on you. Do you know who Brian Greene
>>>>>> is ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do you think he is a crackpot?
>>>>> 
>>>>> No. He writes books that sadly stimulate and
>>>>> even generate large amounts of persistent
>>>>> crackpots. In this regard Hawking is even
>>>>> worse though. I'm sure the both of you have
>>>>> read Hawking's book on time.
>>>> 
>>>> I glanced through it at Standaard boekhandel,
>>>> in Antwerp. It said nothing and explained
>>>> nothing about time, so I did not buy it. I
>>>> bought and read a book(let) which was a
>>>> collection of lectures of Hawking and Penrose
>>>> on Space and Time, but found it very much
>>>> lacking too. The best book on time is still
>>>> "About Time" form Paul Davies.
>>> 
>>> Yes, I can imagine that you liked it. Good grief,
>>>  it's another first class crackpot factory. Even
>>> worse than Hawking's.
>> 
>> It is not.
> 
> It is.
> 
>> You should like it.
> 
> I hated it.

As I remember well, you hated me reading "Gravitation"
too. So far for your judgment. And never any real
argument returned.

> It is standard popsci targeted at the illiterate
> amateur.

And of course, with you being the judge on who is
literate or not.

> If you would have had a formal education in physics,
> you would know that. So you don't.

Non-argument, again. Do you have any other, given your
"rich" formal education ?

> Crackpot honey pot.

It is jackpot.

Coming soon, to every real scientific publication near you.

Uwe Hayek.


-- 
Als ik nu op dit moment geld transfereer [in Belgi�] 
naar een
andere rekening staat dat een uur later daar gecrediteerd.
-- Boutros Gali, realiteitsdeskundige.