🚀 go-pugleaf

Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
  495f6263$0$200$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
>> Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>> 495f2855$0$201$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
>>> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
>>>> Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in message
>>>>  495e8d0e$0$183$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
>>>>> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
>>>>>> Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in
>>>>>> message
>>>>>> 495df611$0$198$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
>>>>>>> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hayek <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in
>>>>>>>>  message
>>>>>>>> 495d1c8a$0$201$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl
>>>>>>>>> lucien.coste wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> et le temps que tu perds et celui que
>>>>>>>>>> tu fais perdre aux autres par ta
>>>>>>>>>> manie haineuse, injuste et totalement
>>>>>>>>>> peinte d'incomp�tence... ce temps-l�
>>>>>>>>>> tu as l'air de l'oublier
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lucien COSTE
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pour moi, les liens que Pentcho apporte
>>>>>>>>>  sont tr�s interessantes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pas de surprise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But you do not read them, so they are
>>>>>>> wasted on you. Do you know who Brian Greene
>>>>>>> is ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you think he is a crackpot?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. He writes books that sadly stimulate and
>>>>>> even generate large amounts of persistent
>>>>>> crackpots. In this regard Hawking is even
>>>>>> worse though. I'm sure the both of you have
>>>>>> read Hawking's book on time.
>>>>>
>>>>> I glanced through it at Standaard boekhandel,
>>>>> in Antwerp. It said nothing and explained
>>>>> nothing about time, so I did not buy it. I
>>>>> bought and read a book(let) which was a
>>>>> collection of lectures of Hawking and Penrose
>>>>> on Space and Time, but found it very much
>>>>> lacking too. The best book on time is still
>>>>> "About Time" form Paul Davies.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I can imagine that you liked it. Good grief,
>>>>  it's another first class crackpot factory. Even
>>>> worse than Hawking's.
>>>
>>> It is not.
>>
>> It is.
>>
>>> You should like it.
>>
>> I hated it.
>
> As I remember well, you hated me reading "Gravitation"
> too.

You haven't read "Gravitation".
And you can stop waving your flag
     http://www.xs4all.nl/~notime/inert/gravp543.html

> So far for your judgment. And never any real
> argument returned.

Arguments bounce on proven crackpots, so you don't get any
from me anymore.

Dirk Vdm