Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7077Re: WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE AFTER ALL?
From: Androcles
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:12
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:12
25 lines
2474 bytes
2474 bytes
"Hayek" <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in message news:48f87e8b$0$196$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl... > Pentcho Valev wrote: > >> http://books.google.com/books?id=JokgnS1JtmMC >> "Relativity and Its Roots" By Banesh Hoffmann >> p.92: "There are various remarks to be made about this second >> principle. For instance, if it is so obvious, how could it turn out to >> be part of a revolution - especially when the first principle is also >> a natural one? Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein >> had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this >> one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding >> train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the >> speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object >> emitting it. > > Let me concentrate on the last one first. > > You can compare it to sound. Let me concentrate on the first one first. NO YOU CANNOT! Light, sound and thrown stones do not compare in any way whatosover.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C25Kk.21719$dN6.15108@newsfe18.ams2>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!eweka.nl!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe18.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<f0c49414-5ea4-4693-8f08-8992eef24776@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <48f87e8b$0$196$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,3b089a1bafe7dbfb X-Google-Thread: 10b271,3b089a1bafe7dbfb X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,3b089a1bafe7dbfb X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,gid10b271,gidfa4c1,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!eweka.nl!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe18.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique References: <f0c49414-5ea4-4693-8f08-8992eef24776@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <48f87e8b$0$196$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE AFTER ALL? Lines: 32 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: <C25Kk.21719$dN6.15108@newsfe18.ams2> NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.34.70.125 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe18.ams2 1224269090 82.34.70.125 (Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:44:50 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:44:50 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:12:42 +0100