Article View: sci.physics.relativity
Article #7078Re: WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE AFTER ALL?
From: Dirk Van de moortel
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:48
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:48
30 lines
2538 bytes
2538 bytes
Androcles <Headmaster@Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message C25Kk.21719$dN6.15108@newsfe18.ams2 > "Hayek" <hayektt@nospam.xs4all.nl> wrote in message > news:48f87e8b$0$196$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl... >> Pentcho Valev wrote: >> >>> http://books.google.com/books?id=JokgnS1JtmMC >>> "Relativity and Its Roots" By Banesh Hoffmann >>> p.92: "There are various remarks to be made about this second >>> principle. For instance, if it is so obvious, how could it turn out to >>> be part of a revolution - especially when the first principle is also >>> a natural one? Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein >>> had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this >>> one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding >>> train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the >>> speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object >>> emitting it. >> >> Let me concentrate on the last one first. >> >> You can compare it to sound. > > > Let me concentrate on the first one first. > NO YOU CANNOT! Light, sound and thrown stones do not compare > in any way whatosover. Go get him, farto, KILL! Dirk Vdm
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<m65Kk.37622$Ab4.28203@newsfe15.ams2>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf02.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe15.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mailReferences:
<f0c49414-5ea4-4693-8f08-8992eef24776@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <48f87e8b$0$196$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <C25Kk.21719$dN6.15108@newsfe18.ams2>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,3b089a1bafe7dbfb X-Google-Attributes: gidfa4c1,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf02.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe15.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@nospAm.hotmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,fr.sci.physique References: <f0c49414-5ea4-4693-8f08-8992eef24776@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <48f87e8b$0$196$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <C25Kk.21719$dN6.15108@newsfe18.ams2> Subject: Re: WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE AFTER ALL? Lines: 30 Organization: @Home MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Message-ID: <m65Kk.37622$Ab4.28203@newsfe15.ams2> NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.195.5.123 X-Complaints-To: http://telenet.be/ X-Trace: newsfe15.ams2 1224269330 84.195.5.123 (Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:48:50 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:48:50 UTC Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:48:38 +0200