🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 10, 8:57 am, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh>
wrote:
> extremesoundandli...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On Sep 10, 8:13 am, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh>
> > wrote:
> >> extremesoundandli...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>> On Sep 10, 7:56 am, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
>
> >>>>> Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>>>> a440e074-b399-496f-b9f2-57da0a306...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com
> >>>>>> On Sep 10, 5:26 am, "Spaceman"
> >>>>>> <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Pentcho Valev wrote:
> >>>>>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pLCOizNSLI&feature=related
>
> >>>>>>> OMG,
> >>>>>>> Two either complete morons or just con men.
> >>>>>>> :)
>
> >>>>>>> Brian Cox the moron that does not understand how clocks work,
> >>>>>>> nor what "time" is.
> >>>>>>> A Simple dingleberry that can not follow the history of the
> >>>>>>> clock. and Max Tegmark that does not understand there is no
> >>>>>>> "real" negatives in the universe.
> >>>>>>> Ask Max to move negative 20 feet away and prove he is not 20
> >>>>>>> positive feet away now.
> >>>>>>> LOL
>
> >>>>>> Yet both morons become geniuses when you compare them with Brian
> >>>>>> Greene, Einsteiniana's Showman:
>
> >>>>> I bet you don't have the guts, nor the ability to explain to
> >>>>> Spaceman, one of your greatest and most intelligent fans,
> >>>>> that (-4) * (-4) is not -16:
> >>>>>http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Dingbat.html
> >>>>> Go ahead.
>
> >>>> Poor Dirk, he does not get that there are no real negatives,
> >>>> and he still has not proven that he can move a negative distance
> >>>> away from me and not be a postive distance away when he has done
> >>>> so. :)
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> James M Driscoll Jr
> >>>> Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
> >>>> Spaceman- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>
> >>> if the medium your standing on is traveling in a positive or
> >>> negative direction faster than any direction of your movement then
> >>> their is no way to move on that medium in a positive or negative
> >>> direction their spanky, does that make any logical sense to you sir.
>
> >> Please move negtively 100 yds away from me and prove you did
> >> not actually move a postive 100 yds away from me.
> >> Take your "negative" motion and get rid of it, there is no "negative"
> >> motion in reality.
>
> >>> for instance if your on a train traveling and the train is traveling
> >>> at 100 miles an hour and your friend with you on the train steps in
> >>> front or behind you your still moving in a positive direction even
> >>> if he steps away from you because of the movement of the train
> >>> .only if you exceed 100 miles an hour in the direction of the
> >>> trains forward path can you or your friend move in a negative or
> >>> positive direction.
>
> >> People move postive distances always.
> >> The directions change, but they never truly move a negative
> >> distance.
> >> Again,
> >> Please move 100 yds away from me and then prove you did not
> >> move a positive 100 yds away.
>
> >> Take your negative motion and shove it Einsteins dingleberry
> >> collector, since you are so close to it you won't even have to
> >> move postive nor negative to get there.
> >> :)
>
> >> --
> >> James M Driscoll Jr
> >> Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
> >> Spaceman- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > yes in your frame and my of refrance between you and me moving away
> > from each other  in any direction only a mesurable distance is achived
> > whether it was positive or negative depends on the veiwers frame of
> > refrance. can you argue with that with out blowing out nut sack. why
> > couldn't I have moved a negative distance from you at that same
> > hundred feet.
>
> Because you are giving "negative" direction a "reality" it does not
> have.
> Observers can not determine a "true" negative anymore than they can
> prove east is always to the right yet to the left for others facing the
> other way.
> You can not move negative distances without moving a positive distance
> to begin with.
> Observer "trickery" is just that... "trickery" to allow a negative distance
> that does not truly exist in reality.
> Can you also take away 5 apples from me when I only have 1 so I
> will then have -4 apples?
>
> The fact of the whole thing is...
> There are no "physical" negatives.
>
> --
> James M Driscoll Jr
> Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
> Spaceman- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I agree but movement through a space time contenium is not mesured in
postive or negatives only distance and time